Mario Lang, le Wed 02 Sep 2015 00:01:26 +0200, a écrit :
> I'd rather like to remove it before stretch, so maybe try to remove it
> from build-deps of dasher.
Rather replace it with speech-dispatcher, and make sure that configure
picks it up.
Samuel
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Mario Lang, le Tue 01 Sep 2015 17:08:53 +0200, a écrit :
>> Or does anyone know of an effort to port it to at-spi2 and speech-dispatcher?
>> Does it still work / do anything useful?
>
> It still works to type text and then copy/paste somewhere else. As such
> I believe
I'm resending the mail to the proper Qt/KDE list.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Enabling accessibility stack by default in Qt4/Qt5
Date: Tuesday 01 September 2015, 18:50:43
From: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
To: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
CC: Samuel Thibault
On Tuesday 01 September 2015 01:39:51 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As discussed at DebConf [1,2,3], we would like to make the accessibility
> stack enabled by default, so that all a user who needs it has to do is
> just to start orca (while at the moment she has to find an option in
> the c
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 05:25:24PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> >> works, but that is barely a solution since you will not be able to
> >> follow any site-specific links. It is a shame lynx apparently doesn't
> >> have support for client certificates.
> > I tried to patch it but ran into #797059.
>
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 17:08 +0200, Mario Lang wrote:
> gnome-speech is deprecated since GNOME 3. There is only one reverse
> dependency left, which is dasher, which also seems abandoned upstream
I see that dasher is in jessie and sid.
It was (and I think, still is) one of the most innovative re
Mario Lang, le Tue 01 Sep 2015 17:08:53 +0200, a écrit :
> Or does anyone know of an effort to port it to at-spi2 and speech-dispatcher?
> Does it still work / do anything useful?
It still works to type text and then copy/paste somewhere else. As such
I believe it can still be useful.
Also, it s
Hi.
gnome-speech is deprecated since GNOME 3. There is only one reverse
dependency left, which is dasher, which also seems abandoned upstream
since 2010.
I have no experience with dasher, and can not test it either.
It looks like dasher should be removed from the archive.
Or does anyone know of
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
screader is no longer maintained upstream since more than 10 years.
These days, Debian contains other, more maintained, screen reading
solution for speech and console. The general consensus on our list is,
that we can let go of this package. Please remove
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 10:09:44 +0200
Source: java-atk-wrapper
Binary: libatk-wrapper-java libatk-wrapper-java-jni
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.33.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Acc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
tags 797059 + patch
severity 797059 important
thanks
Hello,
please see the attached patch, which adds support for rehandshaking.
This now allows access to http:/contributors.debian.org
Bye,
Simon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
i
java-atk-wrapper_0.33.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java-atk-wrapper_0.33.0-4.dsc
java-atk-wrapper_0.33.0-4.debian.tar.bz2
libatk-wrapper-java-jni_0.33.0-4_amd64.deb
libatk-wrapper-java_0.33.0-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daem
java-atk-wrapper_0.33.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
java-atk-wrapper_0.33.0-4.dsc
java-atk-wrapper_0.33.0-4.debian.tar.bz2
libatk-wrapper-java-jni_0.33.0-4_amd64.deb
libatk-wrapper-java_0.33.0-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debi
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Then it should be documented on the wiki, not at a random point in time
> in the java mailing list or bugreport.
Maybe. Then take that to the people who do such things.
I’m “just” a buildd admin.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße
Thorsten Glaser, le Tue 01 Sep 2015 09:58:54 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > - "I don't think it is possible (yet) to have a >= dependency on a java
> > version." and yes, I was lazy to look for a proper solution.
>
> It is, and precisely this was recommended
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> - "I don't think it is possible (yet) to have a >= dependency on a java
> version." and yes, I was lazy to look for a proper solution.
It is, and precisely this was recommended on some Debian java
mailing list or bugreport for precisely this problem.
Thorsten Glaser, le Tue 01 Sep 2015 09:13:17 +0200, a écrit :
> why don't you version the B-D then?
>
> Build-Depends: ..., default-jdk (>= 2:1.6), ...
Because:
- "I don't think it is possible (yet) to have a >= dependency on a java
version." and yes, I was lazy to look for a proper solution.
Hi,
why don't you version the B-D then?
Build-Depends: ..., default-jdk (>= 2:1.6), ...
That will cause GCJ arches to not even attempt the build,
beneficial for all.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
tarent solutions GmbH
Rochusstraße 2-4, D-53123 Bonn • http://www.tarent.de/
Tel: +49 228 54881-393 • Fax: +
18 matches
Mail list logo
