Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 636409 O: emacspeak-ss -- Emacspeak speech servers for ...
Bug #636409 [wnpp] ITA: emacspeak-ss -- Emacspeak speech servers for ...
Changed Bug title to 'O: emacspeak-ss -- Emacspeak speech servers for ...' from
'ITA: emacspeak-ss -- Emac
retitle 636409 O: emacspeak-ss -- Emacspeak speech servers for ...
noowner 636409
tag 636409 - pending
thanks
Hi,
A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting emacspeak-ss. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open
for a too long time, as i
- Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 13:14:07 +0100, a écrit :
> > - Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > > MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
> >
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 13:14:07 +0100, a écrit :
> - Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
> > > and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
> > > braille, speech and magnifying, in part
- Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
> > and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
> > braille, speech and magnifying, in particular due to its visual
> > customization capabilities, disappeared in gn
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 12:06:35 +0100, a écrit :
> and MATE is much more suit when we try to have a universal desktop with
> braille, speech and magnifying, in particular due to its visual customization
> capabilities, disappeared in gnome.
Mmm, but do we have magnification su
>
> > which seems to enact that gnome is fine enough.
>
> Yes, again, gnome *is* fine enough. But can't we fine-tune the default
> when we know for sure that the user is using braille? Notably since it
> seems we'd better go with gnome with its integrated magnifier for people
> with low vision,
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 11:36:06 +0100, a écrit :
> > Well, I don't remember an announcement about it. I didn't know that
> > the choice had been actually really settled,[...]
>
> Well, you could have asked;
Well, that's what I am doing. I guess my timeout value was just too
large.
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 11:36:06 +0100, a écrit :
> > It seemed clear to me, except that since at the time the poll was done
> > MATE was actually not among the choices in the evaluation chart (and not
> > even a task), Jean-Philippe made it a special case.
>
> !!
>
> “[…] I think Deb
Samuel Thibault (2014-12-01):
> Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 10:39:17 +0100, a écrit :
> > With the tasksel/3.25 upload and the default switch back to gnome, it
> > looked to me that the accessibility side was taken care of.
>
> What do you mean by "taken care of"?
>
> If you mean fixing
Hello,
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 10:39:17 +0100, a écrit :
> With the tasksel/3.25 upload and the default switch back to gnome, it
> looked to me that the accessibility side was taken care of.
What do you mean by "taken care of"?
If you mean fixing them, the few accessibility issues th
Samuel Thibault (2014-12-01):
> Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 01 Dec 2014 09:41:20 +0100, a écrit :
> > > As it seems that Jessie will install the gnome desktop by default, I
> > > would like to upload the attached changes. The idea is that the most
> > > accessible desktop we have in Debian is MATE
>
Just for information, could you provide further details about areas where
accessibility in mate is better than in Gnome or point me to any link that
talks about that?
I am using Jessie and I should install a desktop, so this information can be
really useful...
Inviato da iPhone
> Il giorno
13 matches
Mail list logo
