Re: systemd and accessible vt's

Hi, On Di, Dez 03, 2013 at 06:59:13 +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote: > Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100: > >Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt > >in userspace. > >In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set. > >If someone tries to remove vt

Re: systemd and accessible vt's

Hello Halim, Halim Sahin schrieb am 03.12.2013, 18:17 +0100: >Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt >in userspace. >In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set. >If someone tries to remove vt support from kernel completely we.ll loose >a great, stable env

systemd and accessible vt's

Hi all, Last week I've read about a rfc in systemd which tries to implement vt in userspace. In that case config_vt in kernel don't need to be set. If someone tries to remove vt support from kernel completely we.ll loose a great, stable environment. Afaik sbl and brltty depend on /dev/vcs* /dev/tty