Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-17 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Hi, If I understood everything (note that Debian gnome team was in Cc om my mail), gnome team doesn't want to replace Mario on atspi, as they don't know the applications and they prefer waiting for his analysis. That's why I think we should try experimental before thinking of sid, hoping he'll be

Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-17 Thread Jason White
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > - I would update the packages on experimental. Thus, even sid users will > be able to work using experimental packages, without needing push to > sid. Perhaps it would be better just to ask the Debian Gnome maintainers if they can do an NMU of the packages directl

Re: GNOME 3.2 / pyatspi / at-spi2-core

2011-12-17 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Hi guys, It seems that Mario is very busy and cannot answer. I would like to help, however everybody knows that my technical skills are limited, so I can't take a decision and test beyond the user point of view. So I propose something: - Could someone tell me what packages shuld be updated? - I w