On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:40:23AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> You can add more in /etc/inittab: just copy/paste the getty line and
> increase the two numbers.
Yeah, I know about that, but I wonce heard it mangles Debian's
flippin way of doing everything, or at least trying to move th
Mario Lang wrote:
> Upstart is indeed the most likely candidate, but the transition will
> take time. Squeeze+1 or Squeeze+2. Last time I looked at upstart, it
> was not really ready to replace the current system.
In Fedora and Ubuntu, from what' I've read, the existing init scripts are
still
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Gaijin wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 01:37:03PM +0100, Mario Lang quoted:
>> Josselin Mouette writes:
>>
>> > it’s been a long-standing tradition on Linux to have 6 started getty
>> > processes, in tty1 to tty6. However this doesn’t correspond anymore to
>> > t
Jason White writes:
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> You can add more in /etc/inittab: just copy/paste the getty line and
>> increase the two numbers.
>
> And the procedure will be slightly different (I haven't checked out the
> details) if and when Debian moves from System V init to Upstart or whate
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> You can add more in /etc/inittab: just copy/paste the getty line and
> increase the two numbers.
And the procedure will be slightly different (I haven't checked out the
details) if and when Debian moves from System V init to Upstart or whatever
the chosen successor is. Su
Gaijin, le Sat 26 Dec 2009 22:21:24 -0800, a écrit :
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 01:37:03PM +0100, Mario Lang quoted:
> > Josselin Mouette writes:
> >
> > > it’s been a long-standing tradition on Linux to have 6 started getty
> > > processes, in tty1 to tty6. However this doesn’t correspond anymore
6 matches
Mail list logo
