On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:21:07PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> You're not a casual user then and can use pulseaudio :)
Ifespeak could do what I described, *then* I could use pulse
audio.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@list
Jason White writes:
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
>> What does PA bring to desktop audio for casual users btw?
>
> Nothing, as far as I know. Network streaming of audio is the only mildly
> interesting feature that comes to mind, but it isn't likely to be of interest
> to casual users.
And there a
/liblouis_1.6.2-1_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
python-louis_1.6.2-1_amd64.deb
Either you already uploaded it, or someone else came first.
Job liblouis_1.6.2-1_amd64.changes removed.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility
liblouis_1.6.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
liblouis_1.6.2-1.dsc
liblouis_1.6.2.orig.tar.gz
liblouis_1.6.2-1.diff.gz
liblouis-data_1.6.2-1_all.deb
liblouis-dev_1.6.2-1_amd64.deb
liblouis0_1.6.2-1_amd64.deb
liblouis-bin_1.6.2-1_am
bradsm...@debian.org (27/07/2009):
> Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to
> outdated config.{sub,guess} files.
Ditto for GNU/kFreeBSD; but given we're at DebConf, I didn't check
updating them indeed solves the FTBFS. Might look later today.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
D
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 25 Jul 2009 16:39:24 +0200, a écrit :
>> Mario proposed that we organize a BOF during DebConf,
>
> Cool!
>
> Sad I couldn't come this year. Will there be a live stream?
Since we haven't scheduled the event yet, this is unclear. Thee BOF
room is
Package: flite
Version: 1.3-release-1
Severity: wishlist
User: bradsm...@debian.org
Usertags: avr32
Hi,
Whilst building your package on AVR32, the build failed due to outdated
config.{sub,guess} files.
Full build logs available:
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/build.php?pkg=flite&arch=avr32&v
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:28:52PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Aldo, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 15:06:57 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Aldo, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 12:25:52 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > you can't make 99% of current users pay for the
Gaijin, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 09:14:16 -0700, a écrit :
> I commonly listen to more than one thing at a time, and if alsa
> alone can't handle soft music in the background while working on
> something in Orca,
It can. You just can not tune applications independently.
> Personally, I'd love to see
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:15:00AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Yes, that's what I meant by "casual". Independent volume control can
> > be interesting indeed. I'm not sure casual users really care.
If PA has a good, behind the scenes interface, I would gladly
use it. I commonly li
Hi.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:06:57PM +0200, Aldo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Aldo, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 12:25:52 +0200, a écrit :
> > > you can't make 99% of current users pay for the 0.9% of audio-minded
> > > people
> > > who are needing an advan
Aldo, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 15:06:57 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Aldo, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 12:25:52 +0200, a écrit :
> > > you can't make 99% of current users pay for the 0.9% of audio-minded
> > > people
> > > who are needing an advanced but
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Aldo, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 12:25:52 +0200, a écrit :
> > you can't make 99% of current users pay for the 0.9% of audio-minded people
> > who are needing an advanced but problematic product born from alsa.
>
> That'd precisely why Deb
Hi.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:45:56PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Aldo, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 12:25:52 +0200, a écrit :
> > you can't make 99% of current users pay for the 0.9% of audio-minded people
> > who are needing an advanced but problematic product born from alsa.
>
> That'd precisely why
Aldo, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 12:25:52 +0200, a écrit :
> you can't make 99% of current users pay for the 0.9% of audio-minded people
> who are needing an advanced but problematic product born from alsa.
That'd precisely why Debian doesn't install pulseaudio by default.
We're mostly just wondering why
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:15:00AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jason White, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 11:32:24 +1000, a écrit :
> > Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > > What does PA bring to desktop audio for casual users btw?
> >
> > Nothing, as far as I know. Network streaming of audio is the only m
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Yes, that's what I meant by "casual". Independent volume control can be
> interesting indeed. I'm not sure casual users really care.
I agree. Per device volume controls are probably sufficient for such users.
Most of the time, they're adequate for me as well, although
Jason White, le Mon 27 Jul 2009 11:32:24 +1000, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > What does PA bring to desktop audio for casual users btw?
>
> Nothing, as far as I know. Network streaming of audio is the only mildly
> interesting feature that comes to mind, but it isn't likely to be of
On So, Jul 26, 2009 at 08:34:57 -0500, Kenny Hitt wrote:
>Hi. The only feature I liked with pulseaudio is independent control
>of output volume. If I change the
>volume in mplayer using alsa as output, the system wide volume
>changes. If I change the volume in mplayer
>using pulseaudio it only
19 matches
Mail list logo
