On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:25:04AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
[TLS support]
> I don't think m68k would have issues with large relocation offsets. As
> long as it doesn't support the pre-68020 chips, we have a lot of choices
> of ways to handle large offsets. I presume we just need support for the
> '
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 08:37:02PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been building gcc-4.2 on my mac for about a week now. The first try
> timed out, so I decided to continue the build manually. That failed last
> night, since my router had its daily crash and I did not run the build
Hi Petr,
I talked to Joey Hess, who's set up a d-i testlab to run test installs
for various Debian architectures, to look into setting up aranym as one
of the used emulators so that we could have automated m68k test
installations.
Unfortunately, that isn't going to happen with the current state o
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:46:27PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >
> >Unfortunately, that isn't going to happen with the current state of
> >affairs, since it's impossible to get some sort of text output from the
> >console to a progra
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 01:43:42PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 09:03:55PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Not really. gcc-4.2 requires its patches to be updated; currently
> > (almost) all m68k-specific bits are commented out.
>
> Then why
Hi,
Enrico Zini contacted me here at debcamp with a failure of his package
dballe on zeus. When he tried to investigate the error mode on crest,
all was well. Any guesses what's wrong with zeus?
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
--
To UNSU
Hi,
My BoF about m68k here at DebConf went quite well; most of the release
team was present, as was James Troup for at least part of it. One thing
that came out of the discussion is that they really, really want 'faster
buildd machines'; apparently someone in the security team (I don't
recall who
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:30:46PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Also, I/we've been asked to start building for oldstable ('oldstable' in
> > wanna-build, as opposed to oldstable-security), sinc
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:35:39PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:26:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 06:53:46PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >
> > > I strongly suggest that the box buildding security update use
> > > distcc+crosscc. Th
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:13:48AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello m68k porters,
Side note: it seems weird to talk about yourself in that way.
;-)
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 08:50:41PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 11:30:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Hello m68k porters,
> >
> > I have build all etch security updates that do not build-depend on mysql:
[...]
> > Any suggestion concerning what I should do with t
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:40:11PM +, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:08:32AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > If you mean for etch, I guess you should upload them to etch-m68k.
>
> I will not do that: I do binary-only upload so etch-m68k Sources file
> would not match the Packag
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hi,
> my buildds have problems accessing the wanna-build db on buildd.d.o, does
> anybody else see this?
Works for me...
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
--
To UNSUB
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:42:18AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > my buildds have problems accessing the wanna-build db on buildd.d.o, does
> > anybody else see this?
>
> Works for m
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:18:15PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:42:18AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > my buildds have problems accessing the wanna-b
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 08:13:12AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> One issue is that I don't have a real copy of the ELF ABI documentation
> for m68k. I found a copy of the PPC documentation, but even that was
> difficult. Does anyone have a copy or hints on how to find it? I'm
> worried that the curren
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 06:02:38PM -0700, David D. Kilzer wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ISBN 0-13-877663-6. If you can get Prentice-Hall to get it out in print
> > again, be sure to get me a copy. If you can't get P-H to do this, but
> > yo
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:30:39PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Brad Boyer wrote:
>
> > One issue is that I don't have a real copy of the ELF ABI documentation
> > for m68k. I found a copy of the PPC documentation, but even that was
> > difficult. Does anyone have a copy or hi
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:55:01AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Which I read as it being a flag value for a compile option? Or am I
^^
For clarity: I mean a "compile option", as in, "an option specified on
the compi
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:10:32PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 02:30:39PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> > > The de facto ABI as defined by the toolchain itself may be more relevant
> > > if t
Hi,
I've been wondering whether it might be nice to hold some real-life
meeting someplace. Stuff I'd like to do:
* Meet face-to-face with you all (haven't done that yet, ever).
* Discuss upon a strategy to get m68k to be actively supported within
Debian again.
* Swap some hardware (I stil have
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 05:59:21PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 05:32:14PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been wondering whether it might be nice to hold some real-life
> > meeting someplace. Stuff I'd lik
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 06:30:47PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > It wasn't actually meant to be a serious suggestion, I hope :-) I can't
> > > stay much beyond 14:00 and I'll need to lock the place after the meeting.
> > >
> > > I'd suggest something like the Oldenburg meeting as well. Only I
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:21:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> If I want to interact with wanna-build for m68k, am I supposed to use
> crest's access to wanna-build
Yes.
> or should I be added (centrally) to the wb-m68k group? If the latter
> can someone that has already group membership ask for m
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 01:11:48PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Sure, this saturday 9am in Duesseldorf.
> >
> > Eh, that might be slightly short notice. I was actually thinking about
> > doing something a few months from now, like, say, late september - early
> > octo
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 11:35:26PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> Le 1 sept. 07 à 01:14, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> EMILE, the macintosh m68k bootloader, is now able to manage "multiboot".
>>
>> If you want to play with a pre-release, download
>> http://emile.sourceforge.net/emile-m
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 09:36:14AM -0700, DataZap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this isn't too off topic for this list.
Not really.
> Anyway, my first question is, how far along are you in porting to the
> Coldfire processor?
Not very. Grokking the compiler is my major hurdle right now.
> Secondly,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:09:37PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 4 sept. 07 à 09:29, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
>> BTW, speaking of emile: I've been having issues getting it to work past
>> what's in the archive currently. I suspect compiler issues, but I'm n
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:12:28AM +0200, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > Sure, that could always be cool. Note that you can already run Linux on
> > ColdFire -- just not Debian.
>
> Any details on the linux that actually runs
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:04:05AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> P.S. There is no [EMAIL PROTECTED] AFAIK.
Actually there is; it's an alias for this list.
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:30:25PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:11:21PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have to go to Athens for a week and after that I might finally go on my
> > "summer" vacation to the US for a week or so. Does somebody want to h
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 08:09:55PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 01:35:23AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:30:25PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:11:21PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:08:32AM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> hi, you guys
>
> i downloaded today from freescale some 650 page pdf file
> it is called 68000 family programmer reference and apparently
> combines the manuals refered to in the 680x0 user manuals.
> (which are themselves good size t
Hi,
As most of you probably noted, kiivi went berserk the other day. It had
been misbehaving in a totally locked up state for over a week, and I
started noticing that I hadn't been receiving any mails from it anymore,
so I investigated. It appeared that it was locked up in some SSH
command, so I k
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Routing/VPN off Duesseldorf would give you a quasi static address (we
> would need to put a similar mechanism in place to update the route entry,
> whereas for VPN you would just have to reopen the tunnel after an IP
> change).
I c
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 04:46:51AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Routing/VPN off Duesseldorf would give you a quasi static address (we
> > > would need to put a similar mechanism in place to update the route entry,
> > > whe
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:21AM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >
> > P.S.: new disk for kullervo? When did the old one die, then?
>
> It did not die, none of the two tiny internal disks, nor the external disk.
> I just g
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 06:17:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 09:09:50AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Err http://incoming.debian.org Packages
> > 403 Forbidden
>
> Those passwords got lost. I've caught James on IRC, and he
Hi,
I recall having read on this list that someone's working on implementing
TLS support for libc/m68k currently.
How's that progressing? Do you need help?
The current situation for m68k (with us not being able to update past
glibc 2.6, IIRC) is very likely to be a dead blow to the m68k port if
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 10:21:32PM -0800, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 11/24/07, Mark Duckworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:56:06PM -0500, Mark Duckworth wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello all,
> > >>
> > >> Washi will be killed on Sunday (2 days from
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 01:42:11AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> A little more than a week ago, Stephen Marenka kindly got the 68k
> buildd going on my package (monotone) and I see that a build log has
> now been uploaded for it (
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=monotone;ver=0.37-4;arch=m6
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:10:13AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm running a 2.6.10 kernel on a Coldfire (M5484) and I'm trying to
> get some frame buffer graphics going.
Debian doesn't support ColdFire hardware (yet), so there's little
expertise for that hardware here. You may want to ask o
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:08:07PM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Could someone confirm a bug in frexp() function. Using Debian sid in
> Aranym I run the following program:
[...]
> and get the output
> 0.55, 1
> 0.05, -2147483647
>
> which should be
> 0.55, 1
> 0.8, -3
>
> (The result is
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:15:21PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >...
> > On my IIci I do not see this problem, but that one is running etch-m68k
> > (since for some reason I can't seem to be able to boot 2.6 on that
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 11:34:08AM +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While playing with Erlang m68k build in ARAnyM and debugging Erlang
> shell crash I've found code similar to the following:
[...]
> The code uses implicit conversion from long to a pointer
> (the test is available at http://
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 06:45:58AM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 07:58:34PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > No, it's way before that. It gives the ABCDE... etc output, but doesn't
> > go any further than that. I don't recall off-hand what t
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:14:52AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please someone start the build of dpkg, the dep-wait set by wanna-build
> is bogus.
Did that earlier today. Two seconds later, kullervo took it :-)
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 20
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It's been a long time since we lost out access to incoming.d.o. Are there
> any news to this yet? Is there a plan B already? Do we need to escalate this
> issue finally?
With hundreds of packages in needs-build? I don't
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> In current sid executing 'find /usr/bin -type d -o -ls' results in a
> segfault. This works fine in etch-m68k.
>
> Anyone care to followup?
Having a look at it now.
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-d
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:41:04PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > In current sid executing 'find /usr/bin -type d -o -ls' results in a
> > segfault. This works fine in etch-m68k.
> >
> > A
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 08:37:36PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:41:04PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > In current sid executing 'find /usr/bin -type d -o -ls' resul
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 11:04:34PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 08:37:36PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:41:04PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
Hi,
I'm having a bit of an issue: the EMILE packages have had RC bugs filed
against them for a while now. They're small problems, but in order to be
able to fix them, I need something which I don't appear to have: a
machine able to run unstable on a 2.6 kernel. What I have is this:
- a IIci, whic
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:05:42PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm having a bit of an issue: the EMILE packages have had RC bugs filed
> > against them for a while now. They're small problems,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 11:52:31PM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> Eugen Paiuc wrote:
>> > After upgrade to sid , I'll test emile 0.11-1 on the SCSI disk on a
>> quadra 630 .
> q630's password:
> Linux localhost 2.6.24-1-mac #1 Fri Feb 1 00:14:53 CET 2008 m68k
> $ dpkg -l | grep emile
> ii emile
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 12:23:39PM -0800, James Kimble wrote:
>
> I'm running kernel 2.6.10 on a Coldfire (5484) that I ported from a
> Freescale BSP for this family of processors.
>
> Everything seems to work OK but I keep getting the message "Illegal
> instruction" after the execution of any pr
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 01:47:12PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> What is /debian/boot? Is that part of the initrd? Or are you saying that
> /boot could be initialized as HFS during partitioning? Penguin can use a
> kernel on HFS of course -- I wonder if emile can?
>
> If you make /boot HFS, the ker
Hi all,
After going to a conference, I'm usually filled with ideas, and FOSDEM
is no different in that regard. Also, it was nice to finally meet cts :-)
Matthias Klose was at FOSDEM too, and he asked me whether/when we want
to make gcc-4.3 be the default compiler. I said I'd throw it on the
maili
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:56:10PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > As I mentioned on this list before, I've been thinking it might be good
> > to hold a real-life meeting somewhere to discuss the future of the m68k
> > p
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:41:32AM -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> QEMU can emulate a coldfire processor. I'm looking into the feasibility
> of using qemu to kickstart the coldfire port.
> Michael
Yes, but it's a non-MMU coldfire emulator, last I checked. That's not
entirely helpful.
--
Home
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 11:50:08PM -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> Well, it's been discussed time and again. It's overdue; its time we
> bootstrap the coldfire port. Roman convienced me in his email that having
> coldfire as a seperate binary distrubution is without a shadow of a doubt
> the
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:49:09PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > * What to do with glibc/TLS (anyone hear from CodeSourcery?)
>
> We are currently working with Freescale's kernel engineers on finalizing
> the kernel
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 06:18:39PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> >
> > > > Getting the coldfire port working would be nice, yes... I believe that
> > > > would bring in fresh blood and a gene
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 05:47:43AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Kurt Mahan wrote:
>
> > With respect to Floating Point there are differences within the Coldfire
> > V4 family. The M547x/M548x have the FPU you have been discussing. The
> > M5445x doesn't have any FPU
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:30:59AM -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> Maybe this is a stupid question (and maybe unrelated), but how does
> Debian/ARM handle FPU issues.
The FPU differences between v4 and v5 ARM is one of the main reasons the
arm port is now being replaced. The current ABI assume
Hi,
ilmbase failed to build properly; the test suite failed.
libilmbase-dev is a build-dependency of openexr, and libopenexr-dev is a
build-dependency of kdelibs4c2a, which lies at the root of a whole slew
of other build-deps. kdelibs4c2a is built against an outdated version of
openexr, which mak
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 04:04:26PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 04:12:11PM -0500, Joel Ewy wrote:
> > I recently hauled a couple carloads of computer junk away from my old
> > college, ranging from 68030 macs to Athlon 1700XP+ systems, plus WiFi
> > gear and lots of other stuf
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:55:25PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> > Even the fastest real 68k hardware would only have about double or
> > triple the real CPU power of that system, but some of them have much
> > better disk I/O. It might be worth seeing how long some compiles take
> > just as a comp
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 09:43:32AM -0500, John Jeffers wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a Coldfire V4E m54455evb with MMU that runs PCI bus. In essence
> this would be identical to a 68060 with PCI bus but no built in frame
> buffer and no math co-processor.
Doesn't that thing have a builtin graphical
Seems we didn't Cc the maintainer on this conversation...
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 05:14:15AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
Want me to try it with the same versions on aranym?
>>>
>>> That's probably not worth it. Do you stil have the build tree?
>>
>> No for t2 (aranym), but yes for spice (04
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 02:56:23AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Also, is this the only test that's failing?
>>
>> Nope, there was another one later on IIRC. I'll disable the PosQNan2
>> and NegQNan* checks and investigate.
>
> It so turns out that NaN handling by the testsuite was all
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 05:15:15PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 02:56:23AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >>> Also, is this the only test that's failing?
> >>
> >> Nope, there was another one later on IIRC. I
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 08:00:53PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2008/msg00152.html
>
> The latest SSL remote "problem" has some serious issues for the buildds:
>
> | Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive).
> | May 13 18:0
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 02:16:25AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>>> Well, those machines that were installed before etch, should be safe. Can
>>> anyone confirm this?
>>
>> Only if you have an RSA key. DSA (as in, Digital Signature Algorithm)
>> keys should be considered compromised, too, since th
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 08:51:22AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 10:06:17AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> > If I can be of any service in helping to get the m68k buildds access to
> > buildd.d.o again or anything else, please let me know.
>
> Ryan replied back, s
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:25:26PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:17:07AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 05:14:37PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > >
> > > > W
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 05:17:14PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I figure since lenny is now frozen, its time to talk about our plans
> for a lenny-m68k release. Talking with Stephen, the current plan of
> attack is something as follows:
>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:50:09AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 05:17:14PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> I figure since lenny is now frozen, its time to talk about our plans
>>> for a lenny-m68k rel
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:42:01PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> By the unstable snapshot, I meant a snapshot of unstable from the day
> lenny was frozen. As of now, I have the packages list setup imported,
> but I'm having trouble with the dak import script. I'm mulling over
> using mini-dak
Hi,
Ingo will be arriving around 12:00 to 12:30, which is one hour from now.
Given that 12:30 is 22:30 in New Zealand, we were hoping that Michael
could join in around that time.
Michael, could you join the channel, and shout? If you see this mail too
late, we can do something else, surely.
(Yea
Hi,
I was going to build xemacs21 to try and figure out why it's segfaulting
on startup, but then found that I can't currently access any of my
non-buildd machines, and that the Needs-Build queue is mostly empty, so
I've just put it in needs-build again. It will most likely segfault, as
it did bef
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 06:55:35PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>> Ingo will be arriving around 12:00 to 12:30, which is one hour from now.
>> Given that 12:30 is 22:30 in New Zealand, we were hoping that Michael
>> could join in around that time.
>>
>> Michael, could you join the chan
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:29:29PM +0200, Riccardo wrote:
> Hey,
>
> nice you had your meeting. I tried all three days to log into
> #debian-68k on freenode, but it was always empty.
We were on OFTC...
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
--
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 05:38:09PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> I should have been more clear. These boards did come with BDM modules,
> but my board came second hand from another developer who either lost it
> or simply forgot to send it along (I'm hoping its the later). The board
> I receiv
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:57:56PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Regarding performance afforded by having a 100 Mbit PHY instead of a 10 Mbit
> one:
>
> EtherNAT: 210 KB/s out, 140 KB/s in (scp of a 35 MB vmlinux file)
> EtherNEC: 175 KB/s out, 128 KB/s in (same file)
>
> Hardly worth it, eh?
We
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 12:35:15PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> debian-ports has a limited number of GPG keys allowed to upload
> packages.
>
> Should any other dd's (like to) be on this list?
I was under the impression we were just going to rsync from
keyring.debian.org?
At least for sourc
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 07:36:32PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 08:26:40PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 03:39:49PM -0500, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
> > > Christian,
> > >
> > > I noticed that your http://people.debian.org/~cts/ pages
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:07:36AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 05:19:05PM -0500, Lance Tagliapietra wrote:
>
> > Looking closer, exim is run by a cron task periodically, to try to
> > re-send email that could not be sent, or was queued for some reason. If
> > the mes
Hi,
I've often thought that it would be useful to have tags in the BTS so
that users or maintainers could mark a bug as specific to a particular
architecture. This way, when I have some spare time, I could go to the
BTS, fetch a list of bugs that are specific to an architecture I care
about, and s
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 11:22:19AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >The format, suggested by Steve Langasek, was to use the
> > porters mailinglist as the user, and the architecture name as the
> >
Hi,
I've got perl held at 5.8.something; I vaguely remember it being because
5.10 was broken for us, but I don't remember the details.
Is this still the case, or should I just drop the 'hold' status?
--
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works because there
Hi,
(not 100% sure that this hasn't already been mentioned here; I vaguely
seem to remember that -- but better say it once too often rather than
not at all).
I thought to update kiivi. Since it was proving troublesome, I thought
it best to remove build-essential 'temporarily' so that I could upda
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:19:41PM +0200, Riccardo wrote:
> Hi fellow debianers,
>
> what do you use for sources for apt?
You need to use the debian-ports.org mirror network; other things will
not work.
--
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works because th
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34:45PM +0100, Xavier Oswald wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Im looking for a m68k interpreter and an assembly compiler under linux and
> even better under debian.
Do you mean an emulator?
There's ARAnyM, which is packaged, if it may help you. Not sure if
that's what you're loo
Hi all,
GCC 4.5 was released not so long ago, and one of the new features listed
on its changes page[1] is TLS support for m68k/ColdFire.
Does anyone know what the status of this support is in libc? If so,
could we look into re-bootstrapping the port and starting to build
up-to-date packages agai
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:05:39PM +0200, Ingo Jürgensmann wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:43:29AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > Or have we collectively lost interest and should we just let it die?
>
> Well, motivation is somewhat lower after not being an officia
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 09:33:54PM +1000, fth...@telegraphics.com.au wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know what the status of this support is in libc?
>
> This was the situation a month ago--
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-6
Hi,
Anyone here who'll be at FOSDEM? I think it'd be nice to meet up and see
what we can do for the future.
(I know, I've not been very active in the m68k port lately, but I'd like
to pick that up again...)
--
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works becaus
Hi,
I spent some time fighting with d-i, and have eventually come up with a
successful build:
http://people.debian.org/~wouter/di-m68k/
It's not been tested, however; people willing to do that would be most
welcome.
Note that unstable is very much incomplete currently. You should be able
to ins
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:48:31PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> Hi Wouter,
>
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I spent some time fighting with d-i, and have eventually come up with a
> > successful build:
>
> Thank
1 - 100 of 524 matches
Mail list logo
