Hi,
t...@yli-koski.fi wrote:
> I have tried with download [...] even with Jidgo and it's not find
> all files.
That would be a shortcomming of the package repository which shall
provide all the packages which are to be stuffed into the uncompressed
.template so that in the end a complete .iso eme
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Packages of archived Debian distributions can be found here:
> http://archive.debian.org/
Appears to be suitable.
I did for a test on my Sid VM (roughly three months behind):
mkdir ~/jigdo_test
cd ~/jigdo_test
wget
https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Sounds like we should put this guide somewhere on the wiki, seems very
> useful.
I read it from
https://wiki.debian.org/JigdoOnLive
skipping the stage where a Debian Live system is obtained, started,
and equipped with package jigdo-file which is missing
Hi,
i made a copy+paste error with the "Debian mirror" URL of my jigdo-lite
example. I wrote
http://archive.debian.org/
but it must be
http://archive.debian.org/debian/
(I came to this when describing this mirror URL in JigdoOnLive wiki.
jigdo-lite remembers the last input. Nevertheless fo
Hi,
t...@yli-koski.fi
> I managed download all expect CD ISO number 13.
> Also when downloading 2nd Source ISO from Debian 3.1r8 (Sarge) it had same
> problem. Some files missing when trying download them with jigdo.
Looks like a bad file in the mirrors. Maybe Adrian knows how to verify
a manuall
Hi,
correction:
I wrote "jigdo-live" where i meant "jigdo-lite".
-
The riddle of the checksum string which base64 -d cannot decode seems
to be caused by the ambiguity of RFC3548 which offers two "alphabets"
for Base 64.
Obviousl
Hi,
there is indeed a known mess-up in the repos.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779098
shows the two MD5s, the one which jigdo-lite expects and the one which
it computes after downloading.
"(FIY, this is caused by zope-quotafolder using the same filename in
Sarge and W
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I will try help finding this package. Then we can ask the mirror
> team to copy it to archive.debian.org.
Good plan. But the name conflict cannot be solved in the big archive.
The retrieved Sarge package would need a new name there and thus
jigdo-lite would
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Found it, it's on this ISO image [1] in the usual pool folder:
> https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/sarge-amd64/iso-cd/debian-31r6a-amd64-binary-13.iso
Congrats. That was quick.
Now i was able to complete the ISO by extracting the package from
th
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I have asked the FTP Masters to put a copy with ".old" into the generic pool
> folder so that users can find the packages there.
This raises the question what exactly a user has to do when jigdo-lite
says:
Hi,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> likely to still be in routine use beyond 2038
Sidenote towards ISO 9660 image producers:
Don't forget to check from time to time whether Linux removed the
int bottleneck in fs/isofs/.
See:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800627#38
The bug report w
Hi,
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> That's just a trivially fixed bug, right?
Yes. Very simple. Just s/int/time64_t/ .
> I don't recall ever seeing a bug report or a patch for it in the past.
I did not submit it to LKML or linux-scsi, because i got no reply to
earlier attempts to bring in my userland k
Hi,
i wrote:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201120140633.1673-1-scdbac...@gmx.net/T/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201006094026.1730-1-scdbac...@gmx.net/T/
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> These look like you did everything right, and they should have been
> picked up by the scsi maint
Hi,
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Can you rebase the patch on top of v6.1-rc1
I wrote:
> What kernel branches should i choose for sr and for isofs ?
Ok, that question was probably stupid.
May i understand your advise as
"on top of the newest vX.Y-rcZ in github.com/torvalds/linux"
?
(Given that my
Hi,
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This would be the correct list for the cdrom driver patches,
> my list above would be for the isofs time64 patch.
Good to know. I'll keep both lists in my cheat sheet.
(I guess that y2...@lists.linaro.org is not appropriate for non-Y2038
patches.)
> It's generally ok
15 matches
Mail list logo
