On 6/18/23 03:45, Rene Engelhard wrote:> Am 18.06.23 um 10:32 schrieb Rene
Engelhard:
I don't really like sweeping it under the carpet again and would
actually pursue the "getting those architectures removed from unstable"
way pointed out and (implicitely) approved/suggested by the r
On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3 and
>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about how
>> he
>> regretted the move and the damage it had done to the project,
>> https://archive.org/det
On 6/18/23 15:19, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Besides that it would also have been clear from actually reading the IRC
> log which incidentially also says
Good to know what the expectations for participation are.
>> This is the same GPLv3 package that Red Hat just dropped support for?
>
> As I said
On 5/16/22 03:28, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Matthias!
>
> On 5/16/22 10:24, Mattias Ellert wrote:
>> I have noticed that in addition to m68k and sh4, the builds also fail
>> in the same way on the hppa host known as pasta, but when given back
>> and run on a different hppa host they
4 matches
Mail list logo
