jabber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/Home)
if you want to reach me. I'm also available by
email.
Michael Casadevall
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#debian-68k under the username NCommander if you wish to talk w/ me.
Michael
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 11:00 +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:12:35AM -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote:
>
> > The machine has a dynamic IP address, I have a
> > dyndns pointed at t
I probably wont be able to set up any more buildds until I get aranym
working headless. It will be a grand total of four or five (depends if I
can get the VIAO to run cgywin and aranym; it cant run linux; panics at
startup). The next machine I can probably bring up is order/chaos;
although it needs
Hey Stephen, this is a draft of what I've been composing to send to
d-m68k. Its not done yet, but I'd like to get your opinions on it; I
need to lie down so I'll finish it tommorow. Thoughts, comments, etc.
welcome :-).
Michael
Hello all,
I'm new to this list, but I've recently started working on
Err, oops. I forgot to remove the header of this message; I sent a draft
to stephen earlier :-/.
Michael
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 17:05 -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> Hey Stephen, this is a draft of what I've been composing to send to
> d-m68k. Its not done yet, but I'd like to g
I'm suprised that network I/O was that slow; using distcc (especially
with -j2 options passed to dpkg-buildpackage) have drastically sped up
builds; the files themselves are small, usually a few kilobytes round
trip. Then again, the files are going through tap0 on my machines so
YMMV.
Michael
On
ny existing ports.
>
> The fact that Freescale and CodeSourcery have essentially given those
> hypothetical CF-only port users the ABI, and the kernel, C library and
> toolchain ports means that the best way to meet the needs of those
> hypothetical users will be a CF-only port
QEMU can emulate a coldfire processor. I'm looking into the feasibility
of using qemu to kickstart the coldfire port.
Michael
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 07:51 +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> late to the party again - my old e-mail system broke down once more...
>
> > > > After going to a conf
st wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:41:32AM -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> > > QEMU can emulate a coldfire processor. I'm looking into the feasibility
> > > of using qemu to kickstart the coldfire port.
> > > Michael
> >
> > Yes, but
I personally agree that combining the ports together is a bad idea; no
arguement towards the other has managed to sway me; FreeMiNT OS required
an emualator layer running under its kernel and still required patching
to be usable on Coldfire.
I also disagree that coldfire as a seperate port would
As some of you are aware, I've recently voluteered (or been voluteered
depending on how you look at it) to work on correcting some of the more
outstanding bugs with binutils, and gcc. I've been working on debugging
the -pie issue with GCC which creates the following compiler errors
bc_nonshare
Well, it's been discussed time and again. It's overdue; its time we
bootstrap the coldfire port. Roman convienced me in his email that having
coldfire as a seperate binary distrubution is without a shadow of a doubt
the only SANE way we can support both coldfire and classic m68k. I'm
willing to
27;ll
submit it against the binutils package.
Michael
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote:
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:00:39 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Joseph S. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-68k@lists
I do realize I'm the new guy here, but I do have an outside perspective,
and I do hope I'm not getting out of line here.
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Finn Thain wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
The problem is that adding another port isn't going to be accepted by
FTP masters: I don't
I agree with Roman. Even if it was possible to get a hybrid port to work,
we're looking at so much kludge code to make it fly that the speed
penality to classic m68k would effectively kill the port. If we try and
focus on classic m68k (that is getting m68k ASM working on coldfire),
we'll be hur
4 Mar 2008 12:29:02 -0800
From: Brad Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: debootstrapping m68k-coldfire
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008
Maybe this is a stupid question (and maybe unrelated), but how does
Debian/ARM handle FPU issues. I know XScale requires softfloat, but I
don't think the Debian ARM port was compiled with softfloat. It almost
looks like supporting Coldfire will be a plain pain because of the
different varients
Great ... this is becoming dead buildd week (we're now four buildds alone
this week, cronos, hades, and diablos bit the dust this week due to ISP
failure (a work around is going in place). Can't hobbes pass its email via
uucp or something though so even if it lacks direct net access, it can still
b
hat's all my brain can
muster at 7:22am.
Michael
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:03:56 +0100 (CET)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org, Wouter Verhelst <[EMA
+ (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Brad Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:17:54PM -0500, Michael Casadevall wrote:
I suspose the question needs to be asked; what are people doing with their
old m68ks. Most people around here are using them for (obviously enough)
Both cronos and diablos have been offline due to ISP issues. I've
installed a local source and binary mirror and now somewhat able to build
packages. Full internet restoration should happen sometime this week, or
so I am told.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:55:51AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Should support, but won't do so. In fact IT world became rather monocultural
when it comes down to architectures. MIPS is dead (except fo
d an
etch install available over NFS.
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Brian Morris wrote:
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 22:39:02 -0800
From: Brian Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED
I have keys for my buildds that also need to be added. (and yes, I'm back
from the dead :-P)
Michael.
On 6/23/08, Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:58:29AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > Here is a full list of current m68k buildds.
> >
> > I'd be hap
Reading up on the changes made to GCC for gnu99/c99, I've been researching
workarounds and such, and I may have hit paydirt;GCC has an option which
causes the code to use the gnu89 linkage over the current gnu99 while still
allowing the code extensions of gnu99.
In other words, it will allow c99/g
PROTECTED]
That's siren's new key. I'll manually add the one for my other workstation
after I get setup.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:16:42PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> > Reading up
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
On m68k, gnu99 mode doesn't work correctly out of the box due to our
woefully outdated glibc (we're currently stuck at 2.5-1). This is because
the inline schematics changed between glibc 2.5 and 2.7, and gcc 4.2 to 4.3.
This patch
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
I should not send patches when I'm half alseep. Here's one that's actually
appliable ;-)
--- gcc-4.3.1/gcc/config/m68k/linux-old.h2008-07-04 04:02:21.0
-0400
+++ gcc-4.3.1/gcc/config/m68k/linux.h2008-07-04 05:23:21.0 -0400
@@ -37,6
I've got three aranym instances now functional on siren. Running distcc (I
find ccache slows things down more on m68k then speeds up, but YMMV), the
4.3 compiler patch, and nfblock (running nice and stable once I killed
udev). Aranym reports it as a 195Mhz 68040, and its seriously flying on how
fas
I would like to go, but I don't have the ability to get to Germany :-/. My
new laptop depleted my travel coffers (but did net us a updated GCC, and
quite possibly a working Perl ;-)).
Michael
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2008
I currently have diablos running (its building perl on aranym to see if the
math issues can be resolved by using x86 or uae math backends vs the default
one), and chaos is now online, but I've configured it to build etch r4 off a
local w-b database vs unstable. diablos2 and 3 should be up this week
After talking it over with stephen and arranging perl 5.10 to be built on
real metal vs aranym, we are pleased to report that perl passes its test
suite with the exception of one test, a threading stress test which launchs
multiple threads, and then tries to make sure that they close in order.
Thi
I haven't had an opportunity to run the test yet (my laptop currently
grinding away building the new release of GCC for m68k) but threads on Linux
when using linuxthreads to my knowledge are almost completely in userland;
linuxthreads uses clone() to create them. If it requires real-time signals
on
Sarge has been retired as a distribution. If you want something supported,
you need to go to etch.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:17 AM, stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 13 July 2008 18:06:13 Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> > > At the start of the year/late last year I installed Sarge 3.1r3 on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I figure since lenny is now frozen, its time to talk about our plans
for a lenny-m68k release. Talking with Stephen, the current plan of
attack is something as follows:
1. Install dak on a machine on nemesisnetworks (sorta done, still
needs some confi
Woo hoo!
>
>> but it cannot boot from non-apple drive.
>
> Still great progress!
>
>> it is here :
>>
>> http://vivierlaurent.free.fr/debian-50-m68k-NETINST-1_emile-1.iso
>>
>> The disk content is from:
>>
>> http://people.debian.org/~sm
0, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 05:17:14PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
>>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> I figure since lenny is now frozen, its time to talk abo
R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:24:38PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
>> Stephen, since we still have to roll a new d-i for lenny-m68k, can you
>> include both this and the updated mirrors list (d-ports mirrors, and
>> nemesisnetworks)
PG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkihYY0ACgkQpblTBJ2i2pvklQCeNbHjatJfEnJeWsQd8o5VRbsq
i1IAn1dKHGS3lpcqaXQPvZvIsZjlndhE
=6roa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Michael Casadevall
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE---
ter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:42:01PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
>> By the unstable snapshot, I meant a snapshot of unstable from the day
>> lenny was frozen. As of now, I have the packages list setup imported,
>> but I'm ha
debootstrapping off http://ftp-master.nemesisnetworks.com/debian for
lenny now works. Stephen uploaded e2fsprogs which was the last missing
deb we needed for debootstrap to work. It is now possible to to build
a lenny "pure" chroot jail. If your interested in running a lenny
autobuilder, now is th
I'll be watching live, but I've never done video conferencing (hell,
I'm not sure my webcam is going to work). How will those unable to
attend in person be able to communicate
Michael
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Kurt Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can the videos be published somewhere?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
aurel32 has finished syncing our unstable to Debian ports. If you run
a buildd, please point it to upload there, as well as use
debian-ports.org as your buildd server.
Stephen: Please add the buildd keys to the buildd_m68k account.
Michael
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm just curious on who got what. I know Stephen gave me his board,
but I'm curious to know which boards went where.
Anyway, here are a couple of my bootstrapping notes.
1. Coldfire m68k IGNORES command line args, they're hardcoded. If you
want to ch
M547x/M548x boards. Could you be more specific?
>
> You are using an old BSP. The new BSP I released for these boards uses
> uBoot, not dBug. As for your notes on the old bsp, I don't think those
> are applicable.
>
> --Kurt
>
> Roman Zippel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
) that we have posted onto the website? This has uboot and the
> 2.6.25 kernel in it.
>
> How old are your boards? What exactly do you have? (models)
>
> --Kurt
>
> Michael Casadevall wrote:
> > Your right, we do have M547x/M548xs, but I don't have a BDM module
This confirms some of us have different baseboards, since I have an EVB
baseboard.
Michael
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 00:30 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Kurt Mahan wrote:
>
> > It appears you are using M547x/M548x boards. Could you be more specific?
>
> That's the versio
=ld9h
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Michael Schmitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
>> Michael Casadevall believes we can stage lenny on dports. However, he'll
>> need upload rights
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
No, no binaries from lenny will be going back into unstable to make
sure. If it becomes an issue, it isn't very difficult to resign the
changes files after the fact.
Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> So you may have noticed the following in your buildd logs for python-
> depending packages.
>
> | dpkg: regarding .../python-docutils_0.5-3_all.deb containing
> python-docutils:
> | package uses Breaks; not supported in this dpkg
> | dp
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Michael Schmitz
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>> > Option 2: lenny-lite
>> > Build lenny with base, build-essential, and buildd-required
>> > packages. I can probably do this one myself if there's
>> > interest. I'll probably include anything required for
51 matches
Mail list logo
