mike wrote:
Hey
I've been at this for a few days now, left the amiga 1200 compiling
2.6.28 for a few days, that went pretty well except when i hit make
modules_install i got some unresolved symbols, which i figure is down
to gcc3.3. so i set up the cross compiler for m68k-linux, there i was
gree
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
...
Fixing gcc-4.4 is pretty much mandatory. I've heard there are patches
for TLS making their way into upstream somewhere, sometime.
FYI, TLS patches are in gcc-trunk (what will become gcc-4.5).
--
Maxim K.
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ.
Brad Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:25:53PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Fixing gcc-4.4 is pretty much mandatory. I've heard there are patches
for TLS making their way into upstream somewhere, sometime.
FYI, TLS patches are in gcc-trunk (what will becom
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:25:53PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Fixing gcc-4.4 is pretty much mandatory. I've heard there are patches
for TLS making their way into upstream somewhere, sometime.
FYI, TLS patches are in gcc-trunk (what will become gcc-4.5).
Any c
Kolbjørn Barmen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 02:13:48PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:50:07PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
binutils and gcc patches are at [0]. Let the fun begin. :)
[0] http://people.debian.org/~smarenk
mike wrote:
I tried to boot 2.6.29 or whatever... It was so slow compared to 2.4 i
donno what to say, except its crap. Not a surprise if gcc produces
crappier and crappier 68k binaries anyway.
Would you mind submitting a bug report or two with preprocessed
testcases showing examples of bad cod
Finn Thain wrote:
...
But in that post (June 28) Maxim recommends using mainline binutils, and
since then we have HJL binutils-2.19.51.0.14 released, "...based on
binutils 2009 0722 in CVS on sourceware.org..." So I guess I should start
there.
The last binutils TLS patches went in on 2009-08-
fth...@telegraphics.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Finn Thain wrote:
...
I understand that the current GCC (4.4) lacks the necessary patches,
and 4.5 is still uncooked (and that's a scary prospect). Can someone
confirm that this is the necessary patch for 4.4:
Finn Thain wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
...
We [CodeSourcery] have just updated all of our toolchains, and the
GNU/Linux toolchain is based on EGLIBC 2.10 and has well tested TLS/NPTL
support. If you are targeting ColdFire you can simply download the
toolchain at
Finn Thain wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Finn Thain wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
...
We [CodeSourcery] have just updated all of our toolchains, and the
GNU/Linux toolchain is based on EGLIBC 2.10 and has well tested
TLS/NPTL support. If you are
10 matches
Mail list logo
