Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, at 16:41, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Steve McIntyre wrote: >> likely to still be in routine use beyond 2038 > > Sidenote towards ISO 9660 image producers: > > Don't forget to check from time to time whether Linux removed the > int bottleneck in fs/isofs/. > See: > https

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, at 10:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, at 16:41, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >> >> Currently it's still "int iso_date()" in: >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/isofs/isofs.h line 109 >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/isofs/util.

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-20 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > That's just a trivially fixed bug, right? Yes. Very simple. Just s/int/time64_t/ . > I don't recall ever seeing a bug report or a patch for it in the past. I did not submit it to LKML or linux-scsi, because i got no reply to earlier attempts to bring in my userland k

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, at 12:06, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201120140633.1673-1-scdbac...@gmx.net/T/ > [PATCH] isofs: fix Oops with zisofs and large PAGE_SIZE > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201006094026.1730-1-scdbac...

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-20 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, i wrote: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201120140633.1673-1-scdbac...@gmx.net/T/ > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201006094026.1730-1-scdbac...@gmx.net/T/ Arnd Bergmann wrote: > These look like you did everything right, and they should have been > picked up by the scsi maint

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, at 16:45, Thomas Schmitt wrote: >> I think the hard part here is knowing who to send the patches to. >> Unmaintained file systems are particularly tricky, in this case I >> would have used >> >> To: Alexander Viro >> To: Jan Kara >> To: Andrew Morton >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann >

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-20 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Can you rebase the patch on top of v6.1-rc1 I wrote: > What kernel branches should i choose for sr and for isofs ? Ok, that question was probably stupid. May i understand your advise as "on top of the newest vX.Y-rcZ in github.com/torvalds/linux" ? (Given that my

Re: another attempt at Y2038

2022-10-20 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This would be the correct list for the cdrom driver patches, > my list above would be for the isofs time64 patch. Good to know. I'll keep both lists in my cheat sheet. (I guess that y2...@lists.linaro.org is not appropriate for non-Y2038 patches.) > It's generally ok