On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, at 16:41, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> likely to still be in routine use beyond 2038
>
> Sidenote towards ISO 9660 image producers:
>
> Don't forget to check from time to time whether Linux removed the
> int bottleneck in fs/isofs/.
> See:
> https
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, at 10:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022, at 16:41, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>>
>> Currently it's still "int iso_date()" in:
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/isofs/isofs.h line 109
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/isofs/util.
Hi,
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> That's just a trivially fixed bug, right?
Yes. Very simple. Just s/int/time64_t/ .
> I don't recall ever seeing a bug report or a patch for it in the past.
I did not submit it to LKML or linux-scsi, because i got no reply to
earlier attempts to bring in my userland k
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, at 12:06, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201120140633.1673-1-scdbac...@gmx.net/T/
> [PATCH] isofs: fix Oops with zisofs and large PAGE_SIZE
>
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201006094026.1730-1-scdbac...
Hi,
i wrote:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201120140633.1673-1-scdbac...@gmx.net/T/
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20201006094026.1730-1-scdbac...@gmx.net/T/
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> These look like you did everything right, and they should have been
> picked up by the scsi maint
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022, at 16:45, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>> I think the hard part here is knowing who to send the patches to.
>> Unmaintained file systems are particularly tricky, in this case I
>> would have used
>>
>> To: Alexander Viro
>> To: Jan Kara
>> To: Andrew Morton
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann
>
Hi,
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Can you rebase the patch on top of v6.1-rc1
I wrote:
> What kernel branches should i choose for sr and for isofs ?
Ok, that question was probably stupid.
May i understand your advise as
"on top of the newest vX.Y-rcZ in github.com/torvalds/linux"
?
(Given that my
Hi,
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This would be the correct list for the cdrom driver patches,
> my list above would be for the isofs time64 patch.
Good to know. I'll keep both lists in my cheat sheet.
(I guess that y2...@lists.linaro.org is not appropriate for non-Y2038
patches.)
> It's generally ok
8 matches
Mail list logo