Re: moving affs + RDB partition support to staging?

2018-04-26 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
(adding debian-68k) Hi Matthew! On 04/26/2018 12:28 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: You probably put your stick into a cave with ancient sleeping dragons :) Indeed. Added in linux-m68k mailing list, as they likely have an opinion on how to treat affs + RDB partition support. Also added in Jen

Re: moving affs + RDB partition support to staging?

2018-04-26 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 04/26/2018 12:59 PM, David Sterba wrote: The answer is that we are still very much actively using RDB and AFFS supoort in the Linux kernel and if you were to remove it, you would directly hit users. Based on that I think removing affs will not happen, but the upstream maintenance status shou

Re: moving affs + RDB partition support to staging?

2018-04-26 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:45:41PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > (adding debian-68k) > > Hi Matthew! > > On 04/26/2018 12:28 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > You probably put your stick into a cave with ancient sleeping dragons :) > > Indeed. > > > Added in linux-m68k mailing list,

Archiving the attic folders from d-i for ports

2018-04-26 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
(Re-send because I forgot debian-ports-devel@alioth is dead, please reply to debian-boot@) Hi! I was pointed at Steve's mail yesterday mentioning that he moved the non-attic repositories of debian-installer to salsa [1]. Since there are still some repositories that we need for debian-ports in t

Re: Archiving the attic folders from d-i for ports

2018-04-26 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:37:25AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Since there are still some repositories that we need for debian-ports > in the attic, I was wondering whether we should take care of the > attic stuff and move it over to salsa or github. Could you show a list? Just migr