build logs?

2016-02-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Hi, garkin is back, the first package has been built successfully! It seems a few things have changed, I needed to install the signing key manually. But also the address for the build logs does not work anymore: 550 5.1.2 : Recipient address rejected: Domain not found Is there a new address I n

Re: build logs?

2016-02-08 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi Christian! Logs are now sent to l...@buildd.debian.org. Adrian > On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > Hi, > garkin is back, the first package has been built successfully! > > It seems a few things have changed, I needed to install the signing key > manually. But al

Re: build logs?

2016-02-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
Moin, On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 12:22:37PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Logs are now sent to l...@buildd.debian.org. Thanks. I guess the wiki page needs some updating? https://wiki.debian.org/M68k/Autobuilder Do we still upload to debian-ports then? Because this seems to have worked

Re: build logs?

2016-02-08 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! On 02/08/2016 01:18 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Thanks. I guess the wiki page needs some updating? > https://wiki.debian.org/M68k/Autobuilder Yes, that's outdated if it still mentions the old mail address. > Do we still upload to debian-ports then? Because this seems to have worked:

Re: build logs?

2016-02-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 02:20:25PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > That looks like just bad timing. It might have been that the dinstall > happened just shortly after garkin ran "apt update". Just restart > the buildd. Also, make sure your build chroots are up to date, have > the debia

Re: build logs?

2016-02-08 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 02/08/2016 05:24 PM, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Is this also bad timing? > > W: Failed to fetch > http://incoming.debian-ports.org/buildd/dists/unstable/main/binary-m68k/Packages > > Writing more data than expected (207426 > 200710) Yes. That happens when the metadata on the FTP server