Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, why does this error happen? The file in question is: begin 664 /var/lib/buildd/upload/slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes M+2TM+2U"14=)3B!01U`@4TE'3D5$($U%4U-!1T4M+2TM+0I(87-H.B!32$$S M.#0*"D9O3$M,@I":6YA3$M,BUD;V,@<&]S=&=R97-Q;"TY+C0M3H@0VAR M:7-T;W!H($)E3$M,B`M(')E<&QI8V%T:6]N('-Y3UM961I=6T*("X*

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/09/2015 10:24 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > why does this error happen? Yeah, I was about to post the same. Seems to affect more than just m68k. > The file in question is: > > begin 664 /var/lib/buildd/upload/slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes > M+2TM+2U"14=)3B!01U`@4TE'3D5$($U%4U-!1T4M+2TM+0I(8

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2015-09-09 08:24, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi, > > why does this error happen? > > The file in question is: > > begin 664 /var/lib/buildd/upload/slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes > M+2TM+2U"14=)3B!01U`@4TE'3D5$($U%4U-!1T4M+2TM+0I(87-H.B!32$$S > M.#0*"D9O M,C`@*S`R,#`*4V]U3$M,@I":6YA M;B!S;&]N>3$M

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/09/2015 11:20 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > As you can see the file is corrupted (though it is correctly > GPG signed), so mini-dak can't parse the changes file to determine > the architecture. Hence the error "wrong-arch". > > It's not a problem on the debian-ports side. Then why does it aff

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2015-09-09 11:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 09/09/2015 11:20 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > As you can see the file is corrupted (though it is correctly > > GPG signed), so mini-dak can't parse the changes file to determine > > the architecture. Hence the error "wrong-arch". > > > >

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/09/2015 12:00 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > You have shown that the file is corrupted *on the buildd*. How can > debian-ports play a role there? > > I don't say nothing is broken, I say debian-ports is not the culprit > here. Hmm, that's rather odd. I just realized I received a reject mail fo

Re: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Aurelien Jarno dixit: >As you can see the file is corrupted (though it is correctly I cannot see that. I compared the file with (I just had it lying around here) a .changes for mksh on x32, line by line, and (other than that the mksh file had an additional Closes: line) the keys are identical. I