guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)

Hi, apparently it’s still not 100% fixed, it fails after roughly 48 hours of build time. We had to patch libffi for m68k slightly (but that’s in Debian), in case that is relevant. I could rebuild with “nocheck” and upload that, if needed, though. bye, //mirabilos -- «MyISAM tables -will- get c

Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)

Thorsten Glaser writes: > apparently it’s still not 100% fixed, it fails after > roughly 48 hours of build time. > > We had to patch libffi for m68k slightly (but that’s > in Debian), in case that is relevant. Mark Weaver pointed out a potential upstream fix (involving more complete alignment ha

Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)

Rob Browning writes: > Mark Weaver pointed out a potential upstream fix (involving more > complete alignment handling), so I'll be changing our patch to be the > appropriate cherry-pick for -6. Uploaded -6. Please let me know if if helps when you have a chance to try it. Thanks -- Rob Brownin