ruby2.1 FTBFS

2014-09-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, FYI. bye, //mirabilos -- “ah that reminds me, thanks for the stellar entertainment that you and certain other people provide on the Debian mailing lists │ sole reason I subscribed to them (I'm not using Debian anywhere) is the entertainment factor │ Debian does not strike me as a place for g

llvm-toolchain-3.5 FTBFS on m68k

2014-09-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-3.5&arch=m68k&ver=1%3A3.5-1&stamp=1411663760 is this to be expected, or a fixable bug? If not the latter, maybe it is best to make LLVM not arch:any? bye, //mirabilos -- “ah that reminds me, thanks for the stellar entertainm

Re: llvm-toolchain-3.5 FTBFS on m68k

2014-09-25 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 25/09/2014 22:14, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi, > > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-3.5&arch=m68k&ver=1%3A3.5-1&stamp=1411663760 > > is this to be expected, or a fixable bug? If not the latter, > maybe it is best to make LLVM not arch:any? > First time that I se

Re: llvm-toolchain-3.5 FTBFS on m68k

2014-09-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Sylvestre Ledru dixit: >However, pretty sure that clang does not support m68k Right, that was what I remembered too. Hence my surprise that this package attempts to be built on m68k (and other platforms LLVM does not support). Could be for the cross compilers… but if not, I highly suggest an arch