On 2013-09-01 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
> that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which
> port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an
> overview of which of the porters are (s
Hi!
I'm not a DD or DM, but an upstream contributor and maintainer for the
toolchain, both for different things at work, and in my free time for the
Hurd. I have no plans to stop this, so this will cover the jessie
lifetime. As time permits, I also work on the Hurd itself, and advise
contributor
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 09:33 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For hurd-i386, I
- test most packages on this architecture
- fix toolchain issues
- triage arch-specific bugs
- f
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far.
> First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied!
>
> So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
>
>hurd-i386
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm particularly keen to see communication packages working on as many
architectures as possible because otherwise two-way communications
opportunities are missed if some users are excluded.
In short, I'm not formally volunteering, but if people
5 matches
Mail list logo
