Re: [SPAM] Re: kernel

Hi, in arch/m68k/Makefile, dependent on ancient cross compiler versions? I've got reasonably modern crosscompilers at [0] available by dget. :) That would help for building on my PC, but I tend to do quite a bit of development on t

Re: kernel

Hi, On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I don't really know how to configure nfblock. It dies whether I use > console=nfcon or console=tty. > > | INIT: version 2.86 booting > | [5.83] printk: 181 messages suppressed. > | [5.83] ide_release_lock: bug > | Starting the h

Re: kernel

Roman Zippel wrote: | Starting the hotplug events dispatcher: udevd. | CPU: Double bus fault detected ! | CPU: Halting It's possible hotplug does something weird with nfblock, I usually have hotplug disabled, so I haven't seen this yet... Setting the #DEBUG to 1 in the aranym/src/natfeat/xhd

[buildd] wanna-build

Another week passes and we still don't have wanna-build access. Options: * move to debian-ports * already hosting kfreebsd and hurd * already have support for incoming * gave me access to buildd_m68k as well as my own account on the machine (I was playing with a possible etch-m68k

Re: kernel

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:57:41PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > I don't really know how to configure nfblock. It dies whether I use > > console=nfcon or console=tty. > > > > | INIT: version 2.86 booting > > | [5.83] printk: 181

Re: kernel

Stephen R Marenka píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 10:27 -0500: > How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the aranym config or > command line needed to make it work? http://wiki.aranym.org/manual#single_partition_mount Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

Re: kernel

Hi, On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the aranym config or > command line needed to make it work? There is no extra configuration needed. All [IDE?] and [PARTITION?] entries are exported this way, although the latter have only very li

Re: kernel

Roman Zippel píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 20:08 +0200: > Hi, > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the aranym config or > > command line needed to make it work? > > There is no extra configuration needed. All [IDE?] and [PARTITION?] >

Re: kernel

Roman Zippel píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 20:08 +0200: > > How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the aranym config or > > command line needed to make it work? > > There is no extra configuration needed. All [IDE?] and [PARTITION?] > entries are exported this way, although the latter have on

Re: kernel

Hi, On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Petr Stehlik wrote: > we've discussed this already in PM - the [PARTITION] (nfblock) was > invented to _free_ users from creating partitions so it's ridiculous to > to say that it has a limited value because you can't create partitions > on it :-) It's not just partition

Re: kernel

Le 30 juin 08 à 20:17, Petr Stehlik a écrit : Roman Zippel píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 20:08 +0200: Hi, On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the aranym config or command line needed to make it work? There is no extra configuration neede

Re: kernel

Hi, On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Petr Stehlik wrote: > > How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the aranym config or > > command line needed to make it work? > > http://wiki.aranym.org/manual#single_partition_mount The key sentence is 'Plain TOS doesn't support it (yet), unfortunately.', the s

Re: kernel

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 03:57:41PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > I don't really know how to configure nfblock. It dies whether I use > > console=nfcon or console=tty. > > > > | INIT: version 2.86 booting > > | [5.83] printk: 181

Re: kernel

Laurent Vivier píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 20:37 +0200: > >> and you will have problems to loop mount the disk images on the host. > > > > That's not true - the [PARTITION] was introduced to actually SIMPLIFY > > the loop mount! > > Just a comment about the loop mount: > > I've introduced in linux 2

Re: kernel

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:34:48PM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Stephen R Marenka píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 10:27 -0500: > > > How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the aranym config or > > command line needed to make it work? > > http://wiki.aranym.org/manual#single_partition_mount I've

Re: kernel

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 30 juin 08 � 20:17, Petr Stehlik a �crit : > > Roman Zippel p��e v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 20:08 +0200: > > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > > How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the aranym config or > > > > command line need

Re: kernel

Stephen R Marenka píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 14:03 -0500: > > > How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the aranym config or > > > command line needed to make it work? > > > > http://wiki.aranym.org/manual#single_partition_mount > > I've never gotten that to work on linux. What device is it

Re: kernel

Roman Zippel píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 20:36 +0200: > > we've discussed this already in PM - the [PARTITION] (nfblock) was > > invented to _free_ users from creating partitions so it's ridiculous to > > to say that it has a limited value because you can't create partitions > > on it :-) > > It's n

Re: kernel

Le 30 juin 08 à 21:04, Geert Uytterhoeven a écrit : On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Laurent Vivier wrote: Le 30 juin 08 à 20:17, Petr Stehlik a écrit : Roman Zippel píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 20:08 +0200: On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: How exactly does one configure nfblock? What's the ara

Re: kernel

Le 30 juin 08 à 21:00, Petr Stehlik a écrit : Laurent Vivier píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 20:37 +0200: and you will have problems to loop mount the disk images on the host. That's not true - the [PARTITION] was introduced to actually SIMPLIFY the loop mount! Just a comment about the loop m

Re: kernel

Laurent Vivier píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 21:28 +0200: > > Sounds cool but please tell me - does the loop recognize the special > > Atari PTBL formats (AHDI and ICD)? > If your kernel is able to manage it on a real device it can also with > loop. that was evident. Since most linux based distros

Re: kernel

Petr Stehlik píše v Po 30. 06. 2008 v 21:27 +0200: > case A) need a huge space in a disk image: > > 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=disk_image bs=1M count= > > 2) set the /path/to/disk_image in the [PARTITION0] and choose the > partition type it will appear under ($83 as linux ext2) > > 3) mke2fs - either

Re: kernel

Hi, On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Roman, what if the nfblock had major_num 8 by default? That value is reserved, so I'm very reluctant to use it as default, but you can change it via boot command line. In either case this won't change anything about the problem, it will only chang

Re: kernel

Hi, On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Petr Stehlik wrote: > that was evident. Since most linux based distros don't include Atari > PTBL support in their kernels this won't help much, unfortunately. > Avoiding the PTBL incompatibilities by accessing the partitions directly > is still the better solution, IMHO.

Re: kernel

that was evident. Since most linux based distros don't include Atari PTBL support in their kernels this won't help much, unfortunately. Avoiding the PTBL incompatibilities by accessing the partitions directly is still the better solution, IMHO. If you forgot to include a 'without that silly boot

Re: kernel

Roman Zippel wrote: that was evident. Since most linux based distros don't include Atari PTBL support in their kernels this won't help much, unfortunately. Avoiding the PTBL incompatibilities by accessing the partitions directly is still the better solution, IMHO. If you forgot to include a 'wi

Re: kernel

Michael Schmitz wrote: that was evident. Since most linux based distros don't include Atari PTBL support in their kernels this won't help much, unfortunately. Avoiding the PTBL incompatibilities by accessing the partitions directly is still the better solution, IMHO. If you forgot to include a