Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-09 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Kars said he can test on blz1260, I have a blz2060 (and a gvp series2 > > > which > > > I don't really use for anything). > > > > Good to know. If I would find time, blz2060 would be the first driver to > > tackle (as suggested by `wc -l' ;-)... >

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-09 Thread Michael Schmitz
Hi, > > I'm wondering whether we should go to the platform driver framework on the > > rewrite (as jazz_esp.c did) as well. Can the presence of particular boards > > Yes, for those that matter (see below). OK. > > be probed for at arch setup time (i.e. Zorro config data) so we only > > populate

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-09 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > be probed for at arch setup time (i.e. Zorro config data) so we only > > > populate platform driver data for those boards actually present? The > > > current probe code does not seem to guard against bus errors, either. Are > > > the Zorro2 space ad