Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Great! perl's only blocking about 400 packages, it'd be nice if it built > the first time. For those who haven't noticed, gcc-defaults got updated so > the default compiler on m68k is now gcc-4.2. It's a good time to update > the chroot. Did we have a fix for the gcc-4.2 build failure related to

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Great! perl's only blocking about 400 packages, it'd be nice if it built > > the first time. For those who haven't noticed, gcc-defaults got updated so > > the default compiler on m68k is now gcc-4.2. It's a good time to update > > the chroot. > > Did

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Did we have a fix for the gcc-4.2 build failure related to missing cache > > flush kernel defs? That it me again on hobbes now ... > > Patch is in 2.6.24-rc1 (commit e92042e5c009d84ba741ec4a978a13f260e6ee24). > > You can always manually fix the build environment by plugging in > include/asm-m68

Hi~!Nice to meet you!

2008-01-06 Thread Daniel
Dear Sirs/Madam: We know you from website that there are some informations you may need from us. We,Guangzhou Hadge Electronic Technology Ltd., are a manufacturer specializing in deveploping, producing and distributing computer power supply and case, service power supply,adapter and o

Re: aranym vs atafb

2008-01-06 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Tuesday 1. January 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote: > I'm getting a bit confused - the good old mach_max_dma_address variable > does not seem to get used in the recent kernels anymore at all. Could a mm > expert please unravel this mystery? It suffered from bit rot, as atari was the only real

Re: [PATCH] HACK: Atari ST-RAM allocator using fixed pool of bootmem

2008-01-06 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Thursday 3. January 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Slightly less hackish implementation of that hack attached. This (on top > of my max_dma_address patch before) does solve the ramdisk related atafb > problems without resorting to artificial RAM limits. Stephen, please try > this patch. Y

Re: Missing m68k builds for the point release

2008-01-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > Did we have a fix for the gcc-4.2 build failure related to missing cache > > > flush kernel defs? That it me again on hobbes now ... > > > > Patch is in 2.6.24-rc1 (commit e92042e5c009d84ba741ec4a978a13f260e6ee24). > > > > You can always manually fix