Re: xz

2013-11-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Finn Thain dixit: >> Rule of thumb: xz -0 is faster than gzip -6 in compression and has about >> the same ratio... > >For the kernel binary, xz -0 has a better ration than gzip -9. RTFOP ;-) Sure, I said rule of thumb, this means, in general corpus. >> With -e, com

Re: xz (was Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III)

2013-11-18 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Finn Thain dixit: > > >I don't know how much memory is needed by the "xz -0d" algorithm. The > >xz > > RTFM ;-) > > Preset DictSize CompCPU CompMem DecMem >

xz (was Re: Mac-only binary, was Re: Modernizing a Macintosh LC III)

2013-11-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Finn Thain dixit: >I don't know how much memory is needed by the "xz -0d" algorithm. The xz RTFM ;-) Preset DictSize CompCPU CompMem DecMem -0 256 KiB 03 MiB1 MiB -1 1 Mi