Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-28 Thread Brad Boyer
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:30:14AM -0400, Ray Knight wrote: > I believe that 72-pin EDO SIMMS will also work and may be easier to > find. I had some spare 72-pin 32MB EDO SIMMS and they function just > fine in my Quadra 650 and Quadra 610 systems. I also use a 64MB EDO > SIMM in my LC575. I ha

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:30:14AM -0400, Ray Knight wrote: > I believe that 72-pin EDO SIMMS will also work and may be easier to > find. I had some spare 72-pin 32MB EDO SIMMS and they function just > fine in my Quadra 650 and Quadra 610 systems. I also use a 64MB EDO > SIMM in my LC575. You'

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-27 Thread Ray Knight
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 13:37, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:26:59AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > What's the fuss? Doesn't Branden have a m68k to build on? > [...] > > So at some point he had a Quadra (840 AV to be precise) and did take over > > the xfree building for

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:57:56PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:37:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I haven't yet put the thing back together because it's very complicated > > and I can't remember how. Also I'd like to scare up some 1" or shorter > > 72-p

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-27 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:57:56PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:37:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > and I can't remember how. Also I'd like to scare up some 1" or shorter > > 72-pin 32MB FPM SIMMS so I can max out the RAM and I never have to open > > the

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-27 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:37:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:26:59AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > What's the fuss? Doesn't Branden have a m68k to build on? > [...] > > So at some point he had a Quadra (840 AV to be precise) and did take over > > the xfree

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:26:59AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > What's the fuss? Doesn't Branden have a m68k to build on? [...] > So at some point he had a Quadra (840 AV to be precise) and did take over > the xfree building for m68k himself. Did he stop doing that later on? I own such a ma

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-27 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > What's the fuss? Doesn't Branden have a m68k to build on? > > He doesn't, to my knowledge, and neither do I. Quoting a message from Branden in reply to a previous xfree build hiccup: On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 04:58:25PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-27 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:14:38AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > What's the fuss? Doesn't Branden have a m68k to build on? He doesn't, to my knowledge, and neither do I. -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-27 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > You're getting this mail because m68k doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0. > > As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some > > time now, which are soon to become the official packages (an > > xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v1 source package from the XSF is expected soonish). Wh

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 03:43:37PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Are you serious with the 4GB diskspace? I am not sure if any m68k buildd has > that much free space. Mine definetly hasn't since its 10GB disk died. I > might swap in a 20GB disk from my firewall, but I'd prefer adding new dis

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-26 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op ma 26-05-2003, om 21:43 schreef Christian T. Steigies: > Are you serious with the 4GB diskspace? I am not sure if any m68k buildd has > that much free space. Well, quickstep does, but then quickstep probably is the slowest machine in our autobuild cluster :-) If there are no other candidates,

Re: xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-26 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 10:42:10PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi guys! > > You're getting this mail because m68k doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0. > As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some > time now, which are soon to become the official packages (an > xfree86

xfree86 4.3.0-0pre1v1 - request for porting help!

2003-05-26 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi guys! You're getting this mail because m68k doesn't yet support XFree86 4.3.0. As you may or may not know, I have been preparing 4.3.0 packages for some time now, which are soon to become the official packages (an xfree86_4.3.0-0pre1v1 source package from the XSF is expected soonish). Unfortun