On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 01:29, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:20:17AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > On m68k, mac64 dynamic loading driver cannot have worked from
> > before. Because xf86WriteMmio32Be is not defined anywhere.
> >
> > Perhaps, we should define xf86WriteMmi
[Please followup to debian-x. I am not subscribed to debian-hppa.]
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 06:29:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:20:17AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> > On m68k, mac64 dynamic loading driver cannot have worked from
> > before. Because xf86Write
On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 02:20:17AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
> On m68k, mac64 dynamic loading driver cannot have worked from
> before. Because xf86WriteMmio32Be is not defined anywhere.
>
> Perhaps, we should define xf86WriteMmio32Be function in
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/compi
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>> I wonder if the problems will turn out to be big-endian related?
>> It would be nice to be able to debug it on a faster arch than
>> m68k.
>>
>> I'll see if Branden has the old patch and I'll
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >> Changes:
>> >> xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
>> >> .
>> >>*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEAS
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Changes:
>> xfree86 (4.2.0-0pre1v3) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>*** THIS IS AN EXPERIMENTAL RELEASE. FEEDBACK SHOULD GO TO
>>*** . DO NOT FILE BUGS AGAINST THIS RELEASE
>> WITH
>>*** THE DEBIAN
6 matches
Mail list logo
