Re: xfree86, cont.

2006-10-31 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > On second thought - the changes file has my signature on it, as per > > suggestion by joey. Maybe we need to have it signed with a key from the > > security team? > > That's what I always understood was required. Joey wasn't sure about this himself :-) Anyway, the first half of the stuff has b

Re: xfree86, cont.

2006-10-30 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 06:08:24PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Please reschedule on the regular stable-security buildd, or is it impossible > > to free sufficient diskspace there? > > On second thought - the changes file has my signature on it, as per > suggestion by joey. Maybe we need to h

Re: xfree86, cont.

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Please reschedule on the regular stable-security buildd, or is it impossible > to free sufficient diskspace there? On second thought - the changes file has my signature on it, as per suggestion by joey. Maybe we need to have it signed with a key from the security team? Michael -- To

Re: xfree86, cont.

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Neither have I. Maybe ftp-master checks uploads against a list of machines > > permitted to upload to stable-security ?? I'd have to repeat the upload > > from another machine in that case. > > Please reschedule on the regular stable-security buildd, or is it impossible > to free sufficient dis

Re: xfree86, cont.

2006-10-28 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Michael Schmitz wrote: > > FYI. I have no idea, why this was rejected? > > Neither have I. Maybe ftp-master checks uploads against a list of machines > permitted to upload to stable-security ?? I'd have to repeat the upload > from another machine in that case. Please reschedule on the regular sta

Re: xfree86, cont.

2006-10-24 Thread Michael Schmitz
> FYI. I have no idea, why this was rejected? Neither have I. Maybe ftp-master checks uploads against a list of machines permitted to upload to stable-security ?? I'd have to repeat the upload from another machine in that case. > Cheers, > Moritz > > - Forwarded message from Debian In

xfree86, cont.

2006-10-23 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
FYI. I have no idea, why this was rejected? Cheers, Moritz - Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge2_m68k.changes REJECTED Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:50:01 +0200 Rejected: xfr