Re: status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-13 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:41:35PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves dixit: > > >FYI: the patch has now gone upstream in any case: > […] > >Although if anyone has any strong feelings about it, do let us know. > > How about this? > > > Hi Jesse, > > our paths cross again (remem

Re: status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-08 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dominic Hargreaves dixit: >FYI: the patch has now gone upstream in any case: […] >Although if anyone has any strong feelings about it, do let us know. How about this? Hi Jesse, our paths cross again (remember that CVS fan from LSM/RMLL?), please apply the attached patch. I’ve tested that this

Re: status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-08 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 08:11:33PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves dixit: > > >If you raise $TIMEOUT in that test file, do you get any further? > > root@ara5:~/perl-5.12.3 # perl dist/threads-shared/t/stress.t > 1..1 > ok 1 > root@ara5:~/perl-5.12.3 # fgrep TIMEOUT\ = dist/thre

Re: status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-07 Thread Stephen R. Marenka
Progress! It used to just hang the process until manually killed. (Something like by the time the listener thread was setup the talker had already exited, so it listened forever.) On Tue, June 7, 2011 1:46 pm, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves dixit: > >>- DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck debui

Re: status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dominic Hargreaves dixit: >If you raise $TIMEOUT in that test file, do you get any further? root@ara5:~/perl-5.12.3 # perl dist/threads-shared/t/stress.t 1..1 ok 1 root@ara5:~/perl-5.12.3 # fgrep TIMEOUT\ = dist/threads-shared/t/stress.t my $TIMEOUT = 600; Note that this is an (emulated) fas

Re: status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-07 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:46:16PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves dixit: > > >- DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck debuild -us -uc > > I skipped that part because I already have the latest > Perl built and installed some time ago. > > >- Revert debian/patches/debian/m68k_thread_stress

Re: status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dominic Hargreaves dixit: >- DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck debuild -us -uc I skipped that part because I already have the latest Perl built and installed some time ago. >- Revert debian/patches/debian/m68k_thread_stress.diff locally > (only patches the tests, so no rebuild needed) >- ./perl -Ilib d

Re: status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-07 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 04:52:09PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves dixit: > > >[please retain Cc to p...@packages.debian.org] > > >Is this still needed? I see some evidence on the Debian ports web > >pages that TLS is now available. > > There is TLS, yes – but I currently don’

Re: status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dominic Hargreaves dixit: >[please retain Cc to p...@packages.debian.org] >Is this still needed? I see some evidence on the Debian ports web >pages that TLS is now available. There is TLS, yes – but I currently don’t run the testsuite when compiling. Once we’ve got a buildd back running, I think

status of perl patch working around lack of TLS

2011-06-05 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
[please retain Cc to p...@packages.debian.org] Hi, I'm looking through some old perl patches we apply; one is Is this still needed? I see some evidence on the Debian ports web pages that TLS is now