Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-26 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 10:33:39AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 09/09/2015 10:24 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > The file in question is: > > > > begin 664 /var/lib/buildd/upload/slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes > > M+2TM+2U"14=)3B!01U`@4TE'3D5$($U%4U-!1T4M+2TM+0I(87-H.B!32$$S > > M.#0

Re: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Aurelien Jarno dixit: >As you can see the file is corrupted (though it is correctly I cannot see that. I compared the file with (I just had it lying around here) a .changes for mksh on x32, line by line, and (other than that the mksh file had an additional Closes: line) the keys are identical. I

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/09/2015 12:00 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > You have shown that the file is corrupted *on the buildd*. How can > debian-ports play a role there? > > I don't say nothing is broken, I say debian-ports is not the culprit > here. Hmm, that's rather odd. I just realized I received a reject mail fo

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On 2015-09-09 11:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 09/09/2015 11:20 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > As you can see the file is corrupted (though it is correctly > > GPG signed), so mini-dak can't parse the changes file to determine > > the architecture. Hence the error "wrong-arch". > > > >

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/09/2015 11:20 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > As you can see the file is corrupted (though it is correctly > GPG signed), so mini-dak can't parse the changes file to determine > the architecture. Hence the error "wrong-arch". > > It's not a problem on the debian-ports side. Then why does it aff

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
M1V=H<5-G;GE,:T-Q-WE,=C=".59-=#950D]G>$@*<&-E8U1A:&5L35E'=5-. > M56UP5#-32%5N9%=Z,E)J-RME<&)V8G4U64)0.%%*:VAZ>$E0:2M3,V1J0VYT > M3&EY4`IN,F1A*RM*=C1O64A/5R\W6%-D50H] /4TE'3D%455)%+2TM+2T* As you can see the file is corrupted (though it is correct

Re: Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 09/09/2015 10:24 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > why does this error happen? Yeah, I was about to post the same. Seems to affect more than just m68k. > The file in question is: > > begin 664 /var/lib/buildd/upload/slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes > M+2TM+2U"14=)3B!01U`@4TE'3D5$($U%4U-!1T4M+2TM+0I(8

Fwd: slony1-2_2.2.4-2_m68k.changes REJECTED

2015-09-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
ng like that, afaic. it's like anti-design. that too… may I quote you on that? sure, tho i doubt anyone will listen ;) -- Forwarded message ------ From: Debian Ports Archive Maintainer Message-ID: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.00 required=0.90 Resent-From: Debian build daemo