Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:17:42PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Mailing the autobuilder email from the build log should be a save way > to contact an admin for that arch, right? Or do people filter that for Yes, this seems to be a good idea, but what do you exactly mean with "autobuilder e

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:44:15PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > More generally I think a pointer should be added somewhere in the > > > developers reference which states where to ask for rebuild requests > > > architecture per architecture.

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm unable to find the list you mention on lists.debian.org. On the > > "port" section I see debian-68k, as you pointed out, with tagline > > "Debian port to m68k", but no mention of m68k-build (nor 68k-build). On > > the "developers" section of list

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

> On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:27:17PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > , all down the bottom (although I do > > agree that something needs to be done in that area) > > Thanks. > > More generally I think a pointer should be added somewhere in the > developers refere

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 10:44:22AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 10:27:07AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > 2nd: this question should be asked on the m68k-build mailinglist > > I'm unable to find the list you mention on lists.debian.org. On the > "port" section

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:44:15PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > More generally I think a pointer should be added somewhere in the > > developers reference which states where to ask for rebuild requests > > architecture per architecture. > I would also appreciate if someone added a section 'goo

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:27:17PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > , all down the bottom (although I do > agree that something needs to be done in that area) Thanks. More generally I think a pointer should be added somewhere in the developers reference which stat

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

> I'm unable to find the list you mention on lists.debian.org. On the > "port" section I see debian-68k, as you pointed out, with tagline > "Debian port to m68k", but no mention of m68k-build (nor 68k-build). On > the "developers" section of lists.debian.org I see debian-autobuild, but > it's marke

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 10:27:07AM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > 1st: the address of the debian-m68k mailing is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oops, thanks for the Cc:. > 2nd: this question should be asked on the m68k-build mailinglist I'm unable to find the list you mention on lists.debian.org. On t

Re: please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 03:41:55PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Hi, > last time lablgtkmathview 0.5.1-4 was considered by m68k autobuilder > is Fri 23 Jan 2004 16:19. Build process failed due to missing "dh_make" > command (!), and yes debhelper is listed as dependency :) > > Could someone

please rebuild lablgtkmathview on m68k

Hi, last time lablgtkmathview 0.5.1-4 was considered by m68k autobuilder is Fri 23 Jan 2004 16:19. Build process failed due to missing "dh_make" command (!), and yes debhelper is listed as dependency :) Could someone please trigger the rebuild of lablgtkmathview on m68k? TIA, Cheers. -- Stefa