On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Petr Stehl�k wrote:
> > In other words: your kernel works OK with udev. Sounds like Stephen
> > doesn't have the latest nfblock patch? Or maybe his gcc-4.2 compiled it
> > differently than compiler you've used?
>
> I tried it now with
Hi,
In other words: your kernel works OK with udev. Sounds like Stephen
doesn't have the latest nfblock patch? Or maybe his gcc-4.2 compiled it
differently than compiler you've used?
I tried it now with the debian kernel .config and the difference is
CONFIG_LBD, which changes sector_t to a 64b
Hi,
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Petr Stehlík wrote:
> In other words: your kernel works OK with udev. Sounds like Stephen
> doesn't have the latest nfblock patch? Or maybe his gcc-4.2 compiled it
> differently than compiler you've used?
I tried it now with the debian kernel .config and the difference i
Roman Zippel píše v So 30. 08. 2008 v 10:40 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 29. August 2008, Petr Stehlík wrote:
>
> > I am hoping for a simple bug in the implementation of nfblock. Though
> > Roman surely tested it and I suppose it works for him unless it's called
> > from udev so it's a bit mysterio
Hi,
On Friday 29. August 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Basically I used Roman's instructions
> (http://www.xs4all.nl/~zippel/crosscc/crosscc.README)
I've updated this file for gcc-4.3 and latest unstable.
I just reinstalled the cross compiler on my laptop, so let me know if
something is mis
Hi,
On Friday 29. August 2008, Petr Stehlík wrote:
> I am hoping for a simple bug in the implementation of nfblock. Though
> Roman surely tested it and I suppose it works for him unless it's called
> from udev so it's a bit mysterious. But I believe a bunch of printk
> calls here and there will r
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Petr Stehl�k wrote:
> Petr Stehl�k p��e v P� 29. 08. 2008 v 01:23 +0200:
> > I am going to debug and fix it in the kernel itself as soon as I get a
> > (cross)compiler working.
>
> can someone please help me with getting a cross compiler working on my
> machines? I have tried
Petr Stehlík píše v Pá 29. 08. 2008 v 01:23 +0200:
> I am going to debug and fix it in the kernel itself as soon as I get a
> (cross)compiler working.
Guys,
can someone please help me with getting a cross compiler working on my
machines? I have tried to follow the Stephen's GCC 4.1/2/3 cross
com
Geert Uytterhoeven píše v Čt 28. 08. 2008 v 13:20 +0200:
> > 3) ARAnyM XHRead(16.0, recno=0, count=65280, buf=$8) is called - it
> > tries to read 65280 sectors to address $8, so it's going to overwrite
> > bottom 32 MB of memory with data from the disk drive.
> Same here: 8 blocks is 4 KiB.
>
>
Hi,
2) XHRead(16.0, recno=0, count=0, buf=$8) is called - it tries to read 0
sectors so the answer is OK - probably just a quick test from the linux
kernel if the device is inserted and readable.
ISTR the partition table code does check for presence of a device by
reading in the first block,
Michael Schmitz píše v Pá 29. 08. 2008 v 01:10 +0200:
> Question is how did the buffer addres of 0x8 get set up? The parameters
> make no sense whatsoever. Thanks for spotting this!
I am going to debug and fix it in the kernel itself as soon as I get a
(cross)compiler working.
> > buffer? I alm
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Petr Stehl�k wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka píše v Čt 10. 07. 2008 v 21:40 -0500:
> > I updated my test kernels [0] and kernel patches at [1].
> > [0] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/kernel
> > [1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/kernel/patches
> >
> > These were b
Stephen R Marenka píše v Čt 10. 07. 2008 v 21:40 -0500:
> I updated my test kernels [0] and kernel patches at [1].
> [0] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/kernel
> [1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/kernel/patches
>
> These were built with the gcc-4.2 cross-compiler at [2].
> [2] ht
Hi,
We should close it with the next kernel upload... with any luck, I'll
have the SMC91C111 driver working by then (it did finally own up to
detecting the proper hardware, instead of stuffing up the ROM-port card
or just hanging the kernel).
Does Geert have this in his queue yet?
No. Where'
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > We should close it with the next kernel upload... with any luck, I'll
> > have the SMC91C111 driver working by then (it did finally own up to
> > detecting the proper hardware, ins
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> We should close it with the next kernel upload... with any luck, I'll
> have the SMC91C111 driver working by then (it did finally own up to
> detecting the proper hardware, instead of stuffing up the ROM-port card
> or just hang
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:59:53PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> So it should be named bootstrap.tos or should that just be documented?
>
> I guess it should just be renamed - you don't usually care whether the
> bootstrap runs as GEM or TOS app (the screen output is cleaner in the TOS
> one
Tested this - when running the bootstrap from floppy as GEM program
(calling it as bootstrap.prg), the system reboots spontaneously (and will
run through a memtest after that, so it's really rather like a cold boot).
Changing the name of the bootstrap to bootstrap.tos succeeds ib booting
the kern
Hi,
Due to that type of work, hobbes is currently unavaliable as buildd, BTW.
Could you please test to see if debian's atari-bootstrap works on your
CT60?
Tested this - when running the bootstrap from floppy as GEM program
(calling it as bootstrap.prg), the system reboots spontaneously (and
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:29:00PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Due to that type of work, hobbes is currently unavaliable as buildd, BTW.
>>
>> Could you please test to see if debian's atari-bootstrap works on your
>> CT60?
>
> Tested this - when running the bootstrap from floppy as GE
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:10:10PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 01:44:59PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >
> > It looks like there are no m68k patches in svn or even the 2-extra
> > series that used to load those patches. Do I need to duplicate all that?
>
> I
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 01:44:59PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>
> It looks like there are no m68k patches in svn or even the 2-extra
> series that used to load those patches. Do I need to duplicate all that?
I have:
/data/svn/kernel/dists/sid/linux-2.6/debian/patches/series/2-extra
There
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 06:08:10PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:04:35AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:36:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:36:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Due to that type of work, hobbes is currently unavaliable as buildd, BTW.
Could you please test to see if debian's atari-bootstrap works on your
CT60?
The atari-bootstrap binary hasn't been recompiled since sarge, but I
have an o
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 06:08:10PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:04:35AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:36:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:04:35AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:36:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > >
> > > >Christian: I'd like to see the patches in [1] in the next
> > > >linux-2.6 r
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:36:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >
> > >Christian: I'd like to see the patches in [1] in the next
> > >linux-2.6 release. We should also be able to move linux-2.6 to
> > >the same compiler ve
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:36:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>> I managed to get a udev on nfblock debug log at [3].
>> [3] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/tmp/udevboot.log
>>
>> Hopefully someone can make sense of it and help me out. Right now
>> nfblock kernels and debian-installer don't p
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 05:36:05AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
>
> >Christian: I'd like to see the patches in [1] in the next
> >linux-2.6 release. We should also be able to move linux-2.6 to
> >the same compiler version, currently gcc-4.1, as the other archs.
> >This requires the m68k-build-id.
I managed to get a udev on nfblock debug log at [3].
[3] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/tmp/udevboot.log
Hopefully someone can make sense of it and help me out. Right now
nfblock kernels and debian-installer don't play nicely together.
What's the number of ramdisk devices you can have? I no
I updated my test kernels [0] and kernel patches at [1].
[0] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/kernel
[1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/kernel/patches
These were built with the gcc-4.2 cross-compiler at [2].
[2] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/cross-compilers
I managed to
31 matches
Mail list logo
