Re: more (aranym) buildds needed

Hi all, first off - my PC only has 640 MB RAM single core, so it can be used for light stuff only. I'll try to set it up anyway. This is plain ARAnyM, not ARAnyM plus distcc we're talking about? 3) w-b access - could manually queue packages, but it's a pain to maintain Oh well, yes... how

Re: more (aranym) buildds needed

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:09:59PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Hi all, > > first off - my PC only has 640 MB RAM single core, so it can be used for > light stuff only. I'll try to set it up anyway. This is plain ARAnyM, not > ARAnyM plus distcc we're talking about? It can be done either way

Re: more (aranym) buildds needed

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:12:59PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:29:44PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > > Currently I have a 2.8 Pentium4 with 2 GB RAM doing nothing. But it's not > > > a > > > machine that's not supposed to be online 24/7. > > buildds aren'

Re: more (aranym) buildds needed

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 12:29:44PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Currently I have a 2.8 Pentium4 with 2 GB RAM doing nothing. But it's not a > > machine that's not supposed to be online 24/7. > buildds aren't very useful if they're not up 24/7. True. And that's only part of my dilemma...

Re: more (aranym) buildds needed

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 04:53:10PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:48:16AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Hmmm, although I welcome the possibility of using aranym buildds, I'm more > in favour of using real hardware whenever possible. ;) > Christians buildds are off

Re: more (aranym) buildds needed

On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > But what's about the "removing packages"-idea like boost, flight simulators > or other heavy weight apps rarely used on m68k? > I think getting aranym buildds up and running will be just an intermediate > solution. There are more and more packages to b

Re: more (aranym) buildds needed

On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:48:16AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > So we need more buildds. Specifically, I think we need some more fast > aranym buildds, at least to get us even again. I can tell you that theia > is a pleasure to work with and built boost more than twice as fast as > any of our

more (aranym) buildds needed

"241 bin-NMUs scheduled," he says. (from d-release) From a quick look at , we are rapidly falling off the page. For a more detailed look try . So we need more buildds. Specifically, I think we need some more f