Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-10-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Marco d'Itri writes: > On Sep 23, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE > > > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting > > > >ICE but poor at spotting wrong code generation which

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-09-25 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:47:08PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Sep 23, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE > > > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting > > > >ICE but poo

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-09-23 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Sep 23, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE > > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting > > >ICE but poor at spotting wrong code generation which is an at least as > > >serious

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-09-23 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:38:30PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > In linux.debian.devel.release Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting > >ICE b

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-09-23 Thread Marco d'Itri
In linux.debian.devel.release Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting >ICE but poor at spotting wrong code generation which is an at least as >serio

Re: m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-09-23 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > in recent weeks from the global point of view m68k has started to hold > up the testing migration due to both lacking buildd power and internal > compiler errors. As of the most recent britney run, the number of > missing bu

m68k in danger of being ignored for testing propagation

2005-09-17 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, in recent weeks from the global point of view m68k has started to hold up the testing migration due to both lacking buildd power and internal compiler errors. As of the most recent britney run, the number of missing builds holding up the testing migration are (sorted by numbers): 460 m68k 227