Re: m68k: being ignored for testing propagation

Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the case of the recent ICE problems, I recently went through the list > of packages that failed to build by producing an ICE and requeued those > that would most likely succeed now; so if a package is not built yet, > you may want to check what the w

Re: m68k: being ignored for testing propagation

On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:37:05AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > . . . > > From > > , there are > > 125 packages in state Failed, 138 in state Dep-Wait, and 45 that are > > Maybe-Faile

Re: m68k: being ignored for testing propagation

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . . . > From > , there are > 125 packages in state Failed, 138 in state Dep-Wait, and 45 that are > Maybe-Failed; as well as 27 packages in state Not-For-Us. > . . . > > The release team wi

m68k: being ignored for testing propagation

Hi folks, So last month Andreas Barth wrote to say that the release team was considering ignoring m68k for testing propagation, because it has not been keeping up with the archive, and as a result is blocking fixes from reaching testing unless they are manually overridden. At the time, here is wh