"Richard B. Kreckel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Apparently the ginac package was built a while ago [0] but failed to
> propagate to the archives, according to [1]. Is there anybody there who
> might be able to give it a little kick? Thanks in advance. BTW: Since
> this appears to be
Hi,
Apparently the ginac package was built a while ago [0] but failed to
propagate to the archives, according to [1]. Is there anybody there who
might be able to give it a little kick? Thanks in advance. BTW: Since
this appears to be happening more and more often, what's the best way a
package
2 matches
Mail list logo
