Re: atafb allocates non-STRAM (was Re: kernel 2.2 and d-i)

2004-08-10 Thread Petr Stehlik
V Út, 10. 08. 2004 v 13:44, Petr Stehlik píše: > > > And there, in the "switching to colour frame buffer device" it allocated > > > the wrong memory and changed the screen_base to point to nowhere. > > > > Which means atafb must be doing something wrong > > what if the > screen_base = atari_st

Re: atafb allocates non-STRAM (was Re: kernel 2.2 and d-i)

2004-08-10 Thread Petr Stehlik
V Út, 10. 08. 2004 v 13:19, Kars de Jong píše: > > Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 80x30 > > Determined 640x480, depth 4 > >virtual 640x972 > > fb0: Atari Builtin vga16 frame buffer device, using 304K of video memory > > > > And there, in the "switching to colour frame buffer

Re: atafb allocates non-STRAM (was Re: kernel 2.2 and d-i)

2004-08-10 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Kars de Jong wrote: > On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 13:01, Petr Stehlik wrote: > > First, when the kernel starts it prints the following stuff: > > > > Kernel command line: root=/dev/ram video=atafb:vga16 load_ramdisk=1 > > stram_swap=0 debug=par BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinux > > Console: colour

Re: atafb allocates non-STRAM (was Re: kernel 2.2 and d-i)

2004-08-10 Thread Kars de Jong
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 13:01, Petr Stehlik wrote: > First, when the kernel starts it prints the following stuff: > > Kernel command line: root=/dev/ram video=atafb:vga16 load_ramdisk=1 > stram_swap=0 debug=par BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinux > Console: colour dummy device 80x25 ^^^

atafb allocates non-STRAM (was Re: kernel 2.2 and d-i)

2004-08-10 Thread Petr Stehlik
V Út, 10. 08. 2004 v 11:50, Geert Uytterhoeven píše: > > > Probably frame buffer devices are initialised later in 2.4 than in 2.2. > > > > Why do you think so? I'd say the frame buffer is active since beginning, > > the penguin is there since first moment. > > Because it used to get ST-RAM from at

Re: kernel 2.2 and d-i

2004-08-10 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Petr Stehlik wrote: > V Út, 10. 08. 2004 v 10:00, Geert Uytterhoeven pí¨e: > > > Real disappointed by the kernel 2.4.26 that allocates the videoram > > > randomly and often completely out of 24-bit VIDEL range I have given > > > last try with the 2.2.x kernel. And what a surpri

Re: kernel 2.2 and d-i

2004-08-10 Thread Petr Stehlik
V Út, 10. 08. 2004 v 10:00, Geert Uytterhoeven píše: > > Real disappointed by the kernel 2.4.26 that allocates the videoram > > randomly and often completely out of 24-bit VIDEL range I have given > > last try with the 2.2.x kernel. And what a surprise - at the moment > > where kernel 2.4.x turned

Re: kernel 2.2 and d-i

2004-08-10 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Real disappointed by the kernel 2.4.26 that allocates the videoram > randomly and often completely out of 24-bit VIDEL range I have given > last try with the 2.2.x kernel. And what a surprise - at the moment > where kernel 2.4.x turned font colors to red a

Re: kernel 2.2 and d-i

2004-08-09 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:30:23AM +0200, Petr Stehlik wrote: > Real disappointed by the kernel 2.4.26 that allocates the videoram > randomly and often completely out of 24-bit VIDEL range I have given > last try with the 2.2.x kernel. And what a surprise - at the moment > where kernel 2.4.x turned

kernel 2.2 and d-i

2004-08-09 Thread Petr Stehlik
Real disappointed by the kernel 2.4.26 that allocates the videoram randomly and often completely out of 24-bit VIDEL range I have given last try with the 2.2.x kernel. And what a surprise - at the moment where kernel 2.4.x turned font colors to red and got stuck the 2.2.x cleared the screen and off