Hi!
Just a quick heads-up regarding the FTBFS of jemalloc:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=jemalloc&suite=sid
This is because the buildds haven't been updated to a more recent
version of qemu-m68k with fixes for the CAS/CAS2 instructions.
I will update the buildd
Control: reassign -1 jemalloc
Control: tags -1 patch
On 12/10/2015 06:06 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 06:04 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> nghttp2 is currently BD-Uninstallable on m68k as it build-depends on
>>> jemalloc which currently FTBFS on
Source: nghttp2
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Usertags: m68k
Hello!
nghttp2 is currently BD-Uninstallable on m68k as it build-depends on
jemalloc which currently FTBFS on this architecture [1].
Thus, please add m68k to the list of architectures (which
Eero Tamminen dixit:
>One possibility would be to replace jemalloc package with just
>a header that directs the calls to libc (i.e. on m68k packages
>could depend on "jemalloc-dummy" instead).
Interesting, but so far, all of the instances of jemalloc I saw
bundled a convenien
Hi,
On tiistai 18 kesäkuu 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> In case there’s more boredom:
>
> jemalloc is used by several projects and needs porting,
> as it’s apparently architecture-dependent crap… I can’t
> imagin why, for a malloc, but… so it is.
Jemalloc helps with performanc
In case there’s more boredom:
jemalloc is used by several projects and needs porting,
as it’s apparently architecture-dependent crap… I can’t
imagin why, for a malloc, but… so it is.
And submitting that port to jemalloc upstream, plus ask
all of its downstreams to merge that, so that Debian’ll
Source: jemalloc
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
I think some amount of porting may be required here.
Would be cool if you and/or upstream can do it, but
Cc’ing the porters’ list for help.
Full build log
7 matches
Mail list logo
