Source: brltty
Version: 6.3+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Usertags: m68k
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Hello!
While working on fixing brltty on ia64, I noticed that the package still
disables Java support on m68k. Since Java works without any problems on
Source: db5.3
Version: 5.3.28-13.1+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Usertags: m68k
Hello!
In #719842 [1], Java support was disabled for m68k since the OpenJDK
support for this platform was broken back then.
Nowadays, OpenJDK works very well on m68k and we&#x
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:40 PM, peter green wrote:
>>
>> :-) I'm one who asked there some time back why java7 is no longer in
>> the archives (unstable/experimental), while the last binaries I had
>> installed still work OK on my mini-pc...
>>
>> I'm just curious, sorry for asking to the lists..
:-) I'm one who asked there some time back why java7 is no longer in
the archives (unstable/experimental), while the last binaries I had
installed still work OK on my mini-pc...
I'm just curious, sorry for asking to the lists... I want to
understand if the mini-pc is still a low performance de
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on
> architectures with non-working java7.
Just asking as a loongson-2f user, :-)
What makes java7 not to work on those architectures? Building issues?
Hey Matthias
On 06/05/13 15:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on
architectures with non-working java7.
+1
Patches for the transition to Java7 should be available in the BTS, mostly
submitted by James Page. Some may be
out that. So the architectures to drop java support
>would be
Yeah, sorry, I really should contact the Zero developers about
why it doesn’t work on m68k. On the other hand, judging from
the talk at FOSDEM, their focus seems to be on Shark these days,
and Zero isn’t worked much on upstream eit
Matthias Klose, le Mon 06 May 2013 16:22:30 +0200, a écrit :
> - hurd never had openjdk support, and afaik, nobody is working on that.
There has been work towards this, notably by Jeremie Koenig. I don't
know the status, we just have not made it a strong priority so far.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRI
It's time to change the Java default to java7, and to drop java support on
architectures with non-working java7.
Patches for the transition to Java7 should be available in the BTS, mostly
submitted by James Page. Some may be still lurking around as diffs in Ubuntu
packages, apologies for
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 07:23:34PM -0400, R.A. wrote:
> How's the support for the java sdk (or any compiler, like jikes) on
> m68k? is it available? how does it perform?
I have done some little testing of gcj and kaffe. gcj should work
out of the box with gcc-3.2 release but doesn't have complete
How's the support for the java sdk (or any compiler, like jikes) on
m68k? is it available? how does it perform?
tia,
ra.-
11 matches
Mail list logo
