Re: hyperestraier, OpenJDK and Debian-Ports

2013-01-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Satoru KURASHIKI dixit: >Thank you, I understand what you are saying. You're welcome. >Though I'm nervous about adding foreign architectures which often >make this package FTBFS, so I will change to: > >[ amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel > powerpc s390 sparc ] Sure, that's fine.

Re: hyperestraier, OpenJDK and Debian-Ports

2013-01-07 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: The above. > > What you have right now is: > [ ! hppa hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel s390x] > > > So, your negative-list is equivalent to: > [ alpha amd64 arm arm64 armel armhf avr32 i386 ia64 m68k >

Re: hyperestraier, OpenJDK and Debian-Ports

2012-12-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Satoru KURASHIKI dixit: >Thank you for your suggestion. >I will accept this change, Thanks, you're welcome. >> adep: [48]openjdk-6-jdk [not hppa hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 >> kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel s390x] ↑↑↑ >> I suggest to change it to: >> >> open

Re: hyperestraier, OpenJDK and Debian-Ports

2012-12-20 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thank you for your suggestion. I will accept this change, On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Since your current dependency is: > > adep: [48]openjdk-6-jdk [not hppa hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64 > kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel s390x] > OpenJDK Developme

hyperestraier, OpenJDK and Debian-Ports

2012-12-08 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, can you please use an explicit list of architectures where to use OpenJDK, so Debian-Ports architectures like m68k can build it again? Right now, http://packages.debian.org/sid/openjdk-6-jdk shows it to be available on: (as seen in Lynx) Architecture VersionPack