Re: Bug#649718: -7 builds (was Re: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase))

2014-09-30 Thread Rob Browning
Thorsten Glaser writes: > guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-7_m68k built fine. Full build log > attached. Just quick note, more later. Great, and thanks. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F

-7 builds (was Re: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase))

2014-09-30 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > apparently it’s still not 100% fixed, it fails after > roughly 48 hours of build time. guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-7_m68k built fine. Full build log attached. Just quick note, more later. bye, //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty prin

Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)

2014-09-28 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Rob Browning dixit: >Uploaded -6. Please let me know if if helps when you have a chance to >try it. Thanks. Build of -7 started. bye, //mirabilos -- [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready...

Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)

2014-09-27 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > Mark Weaver pointed out a potential upstream fix (involving more > complete alignment handling), so I'll be changing our patch to be the > appropriate cherry-pick for -6. Uploaded -6. Please let me know if if helps when you have a chance to try it. Thanks -- Rob Brownin

Re: Bug#649718: guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)

2014-09-27 Thread Rob Browning
Thorsten Glaser writes: > apparently it’s still not 100% fixed, it fails after > roughly 48 hours of build time. > > We had to patch libffi for m68k slightly (but that’s > in Debian), in case that is relevant. Mark Weaver pointed out a potential upstream fix (involving more complete alignment ha

guile-2.0_2.0.11+1-5 still FTBFS on m68k (one testcase)

2014-09-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hi, apparently it’s still not 100% fixed, it fails after roughly 48 hours of build time. We had to patch libffi for m68k slightly (but that’s in Debian), in case that is relevant. I could rebuild with “nocheck” and upload that, if needed, though. bye, //mirabilos -- «MyISAM tables -will- get c