Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-12 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 01:24:19AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > I'm not sure if it's a problem with the build (the same sources have > > previously built successfully on m68k). I suspect a binutils > > regression. > > What version of binutils were yo

Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-12 Thread Finn Thain
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Roger Leigh wrote: > I'm not sure if it's a problem with the build (the same sources have > previously built successfully on m68k). I suspect a binutils > regression. What version of binutils were you using? Assuming I can get hold of the source package, can I unpack it

Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-12 Thread Roger Leigh
Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> > > Hi! >> > > >> >> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with >> > > current version and gcc-3.2 >> >> > Is that combination known to work on any other arch's? >> >> I'm not sure i

Re: Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-11 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > >> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with > > > current version and gcc-3.2 > > > Is that combination known to work on any other arch's? > > I'm not sure if the 3.2 is a typo. It fails reproducibly (4 ti

Re: Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-10 Thread Roger Leigh
> > Hi! > > >> Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with > > current version and gcc-3.2 > Is that combination known to work on any other arch's? I'm not sure if the 3.2 is a typo. It fails reproducibly (4 times now) with the current unstable sources (no modification

Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-10 Thread Finn Thain
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > Hi! > > Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with current > version and gcc-3.2 Is that combination known to work on any other arch's? -f -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: glibc build failure

2006-07-10 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:03:57AM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > > Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with current > > version and gcc-3.2 > Is that combination known to work on any other arch's? Sorry, I meant the hardcoded gcc-3.4... -- Ciao...//

glibc build failure

2006-07-10 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
Hi! Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for a rebuild of glibc a) with current version and gcc-3.2 and b) with current version and 4.1. Well, I just came to a): /build/glibc/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/m68k-libc/iconv/strtab.o: In function trtabinit': /build/glibc/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/glibc-2.3.6