Re: gcc-4.1.2 ffi.c

2007-05-21 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:20:20PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 20 May 2007, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Looking at 425011, I found that the following patch will allow gcc-4.1.2 > > to compile. Does it make sense? (No idea, I was just looking at what > > other archs did.) > >

Re: gcc-4.1.2 ffi.c

2007-05-21 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Sun, 20 May 2007, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Looking at 425011, I found that the following patch will allow gcc-4.1.2 > to compile. Does it make sense? (No idea, I was just looking at what > other archs did.) Almost. :) Current gcc (4.3) already has the fix, so another backport could sol

Re: gcc-4.1.2 ffi.c

2007-05-21 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Looking at 425011, I found that the following patch will allow gcc-4.1.2 > to compile. Does it make sense? (No idea, I was just looking at what > other archs did.) If it gets rid of the multiple definition error... it sure looks right. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

gcc-4.1.2 ffi.c

2007-05-20 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Looking at 425011, I found that the following patch will allow gcc-4.1.2 to compile. Does it make sense? (No idea, I was just looking at what other archs did.) Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- ffi.c.old 2007-05-20 2