Tuomas Vainikka wrote:
I have an Amiga 1200, Blizzard 1260 060/50Mhz with 128 Mb Fastmem, 120 Gb HDD,
and a PCMCIA-Ethernetcard.
It is currently running 2.2.23 kernel (pcmcia apne doesn't work/compile on any
other kernel image/source on me) and testing/unstable (Debian) distribution
The Amiga isn
> Richard Zidlicky suggested that I ask for a user account
> on one of your m68k boxes. My usage pattern would involve
> hogging the CPU for hours or days and filling several
> hundered megabytes of disk space with source and object
> code.
>
> If this isn't acceptable for resource constraints,
Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Thank you very much, but I figured out that running the testsuite
will take *days* on a fast 060 machine... Probably twice as much
on a 040.
Well, yes, you have much time for other hobbies when doing some m68k porting
stuff 8-))
:-)))
In the mean time, John Klos has ki
Bernardo Innocenti said:
> Thank you very much, but I figured out that running the testsuite
> will take *days* on a fast 060 machine... Probably twice as much
> on a 040.
Well, yes, you have much time for other hobbies when doing some m68k porting
stuff 8-))
> In the mean time, John Klos ha
Meelis Roos wrote:
BI> Richard Zidlicky suggested that I ask for a user account
BI> on one of your m68k boxes. My usage pattern would involve
BI> hogging the CPU for hours or days and filling several
BI> hundered megabytes of disk space with source and object
BI> code.
I might get time to put one
BI> Richard Zidlicky suggested that I ask for a user account
BI> on one of your m68k boxes. My usage pattern would involve
BI> hogging the CPU for hours or days and filling several
BI> hundered megabytes of disk space with source and object
BI> code.
I might get time to put one of my m68k machine
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:17:54PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:53:52PM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>
> [CCed to porters list]
>
> > Hmmm... a full "make check" takes over one hour on a fast
> > Athlon or P4 system, so I'd expect it to take days on a
> > 68060
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:56:15PM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >>I could give you an account on quickstep, but it's not the
> >>fastest box in our pool. If it's going to take days, you may be
> >>more interested in running it on a different box. On the
> >>diskspa
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:53:52PM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
[CCed to porters list]
> Hmmm... a full "make check" takes over one hour on a fast
> Athlon or P4 system, so I'd expect it to take days on a
> 68060 system. Perhaps I could limit the testsuite to
> C compile testes only to do it
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
I could give you an account on quickstep, but it's not the
fastest box in our pool. If it's going to take days, you may be
more interested in running it on a different box. On the
diskspace front, It's got 3.2G of available space on its own
hard disk currently; and there's
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Richard Zidlicky suggested that I ask for a user account
on one of your m68k boxes. My usage pattern would involve
hogging the CPU for hours or days and filling several
hundered megabytes of disk space with source and object
code.
I could give you an account on quickstep, bu
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 10:02:13PM +0100, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Richard Zidlicky suggested that I ask for a user account
> on one of your m68k boxes. My usage pattern would involve
> hogging the CPU for hours or days and filling several
> hundered megabytes of disk space with source and obje
Hello,
I'm a GCC developer involved with the m68k backend. My focus
is ColdFire borards running uClinux, so I don't have any
usable 680x0 based system (actually, I still have an old
Amiga 4000, but it's out of order).
Some of my patches have the potential of introducing
regressions in GCC for m68k
13 matches
Mail list logo
