Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 10:52:57PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > On 6/29/07, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:33:39PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > > > > >Next time, please sign the whole tarball. This prevents tampering by > >third party (which is more of a co

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian stuff) + On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Brian Morris wrote: > On 6/29/07, Bill Allomb

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On 6/29/07, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:33:39PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: Next time, please sign the whole tarball. This prevents tampering by third party (which is more of a concern than tampering done by yourself). that's why i wanted to sign the

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:33:39PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > hi, all > > just to let you know my attempt to send my ppc tarball to bill in > email failed, some server unknown where to me (called yellowpig) > rejected it although gmail took it it bounced somewhere. Sorry, it seems all my emails

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

Hi, > just to let you know my attempt to send my ppc tarball to bill in > email failed, some server unknown where to me (called yellowpig) > rejected it although gmail took it it bounced somewhere. > > if someone with ppc has a drop box or anonymous ftp spot then > I could donate it but otherwise

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

hi, all just to let you know my attempt to send my ppc tarball to bill in email failed, some server unknown where to me (called yellowpig) rejected it although gmail took it it bounced somewhere. if someone with ppc has a drop box or anonymous ftp spot then I could donate it but otherwise I gues

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On 23/06/2007, at 2:52 PM, Brian Morris wrote: I have plan to get a comm slot e/net card and then my q630 could take two cards (although the lcIII card in there now is need by q605), when my budget allows. then I could test using two network cards to increase the network speed. but yes that is

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > >Try aranym CVS. On my Pentium IV at 3.2GHz, aranym CVS is about the speed > > > >of a 68060 running at 120MHZ (by comparing to the Debian buildd). > > > > > > AFAIK, aranym is still broken on ppc, and > > > > Only if you use a 64bit kernel, AFAIK.

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

Michael Schmitz píše v Ne 24. 06. 2007 v 11:37 +0200: > > > >Try aranym CVS. On my Pentium IV at 3.2GHz, aranym CVS is about the speed > > > >of a 68060 running at 120MHZ (by comparing to the Debian buildd). > > > > > > AFAIK, aranym is still broken on ppc, and > > > > Only if you use a 64bit kerne

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

> > >Try aranym CVS. On my Pentium IV at 3.2GHz, aranym CVS is about the speed > > >of a 68060 running at 120MHZ (by comparing to the Debian buildd). > > > > AFAIK, aranym is still broken on ppc, and > > Only if you use a 64bit kernel, AFAIK. There are plenty of users of > aranym on PPC. Current s

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On 24/06/2007, at 8:56 AM, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 09:52:30PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: thus given a g4 that was 3x faster than the g3, it could only possibly reduce this time to 18seconds (another 10%) the 3.5 times improvement of the compile time is great, but it is

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 09:52:30PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > thus given a g4 that was 3x faster than the g3, it could only possibly > reduce > this time to 18seconds (another 10%) > > the 3.5 times improvement of the compile time is great, but it is not > even using more than 25% of the 250mhz

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 03:39:07PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Brian Morris wrote: > > > the overhead is in the mac somewhere. not in the network per se (could > > be latency in the mac accessing the net though). > > I don't know what your test looks like, but ISTR that distc

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:39:42PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > On 6/22/07, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Please make a tarball similar to the one I provide and a detached > >signature. As for the key identity, that is up to the people using the > >tarball to check, not to me.

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On 6/22/07, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please make a tarball similar to the one I provide and a detached signature. As for the key identity, that is up to the people using the tarball to check, not to me. I do not care about debsigs. ok, I have a tarball with .asc and .sig file

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Brian Morris wrote: > the overhead is in the mac somewhere. not in the network per se (could > be latency in the mac accessing the net though). I don't know what your test looks like, but ISTR that distcc doesn't help with linking (the linker runs on the local machine).

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On 6/21/07, Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:14:10PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > watching the g3 closely with top while the quadra compiles. It looks > like compiling a routine the mac takes about 20 seconds, three seconds > on the g3 compiling and 2 se

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

> watching the g3 closely with top while the quadra compiles. It looks > like compiling a routine the mac takes about 20 seconds, three seconds > on the g3 compiling and 2 seconds of the network (lights flash on my > hub-switch). So I figure simple arithmetic this is about the best one can > do. th

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:14:10PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > On 6/17/07, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:54:20PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > >> hi, Bill > >> > >> I just got sid installed on ppc and my ppc versions match those you > >> give below. I am ge

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:14:10PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > I tested experimentally a little last night with this. I found using > an old mac g3 that is roughly 15times the speed of my mac quadra, > I get consistently about 3.5 times faster compile with simple > examples of one page routines,

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

On 6/17/07, Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:54:20PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote: > hi, Bill > > I just got sid installed on ppc and my ppc versions match those you > give below. I am getting ready to build cross compiler. two checks: > > a) as you say "official

Re: cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

hi, Bill I just got sid installed on ppc and my ppc versions match those you give below. I am getting ready to build cross compiler. two checks: a) as you say "official method" am i correct in using your directions I got off the list or has there been an update (i am not sure what official means

cross gcc-4.1.2-12 packages

Hello Debian 68k porters, I have build gcc-4.1 4.1.2-12 as a m68k cross compiler using the official method. The debs for i386 are there: cross-binutils-2.17cvs20070426-8 is included. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagin