Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-12-07 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:38:51PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > gambc might be a good candidate in the future. It eats >600MB for cc1. Thanks for the suggestion, I just built it and uploaded it. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-29 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:11:30AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Hello m68k porters, > > > > Please mark me (ballombe) as building icedove_1.5.0.8-3 (and other > > packages you see fit) > >

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-29 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello m68k porters, > > Please mark me (ballombe) as building icedove_1.5.0.8-3 (and other > packages you see fit) Looks like icedove has revved. I just gave icedove_1.5.0.8.dfsg1-1 to you. Thanks, Stephen -

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-29 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:59:18AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: >> > Hello m68k porters, >> > >> > Please mark me (ballombe) as building

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-29 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > gcc-snapshot is not a great choice because my setup is fast only due to > > cross-compiling else it is much slower than a regular 68060, and > > gcc-snapshot is bootstrapping itself so do not use the system compiler > > much. > > giving back then. Will schedule on Mark's CT60 as soon as gdb is

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-28 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 06:28:03PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:59:18AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Hello m68k porters, > > > > > > Please mark me (bal

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-28 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:59:18AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Hello m68k porters, > > > > Please mark me (ballombe) as building icedove_1.5.0.8-3 (and other > > packages you see fit) > >

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-28 Thread Ingo Juergensmann
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:59:18AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Please mark me (ballombe) as building icedove_1.5.0.8-3 (and other > > packages you see fit) > How about adding the following? Methinks we need a good list of > applications that would be most suitable for bu

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-28 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 07:59:18AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Hello m68k porters, > > > > Please mark me (ballombe) as building icedove_1.5.0.8-3 (and other > > packages you see fit) Looks like

Re: building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-28 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > Hello m68k porters, > > Please mark me (ballombe) as building icedove_1.5.0.8-3 (and other > packages you see fit) Done. How about adding the following? Methinks we need a good list of applications that would be most

building icedove_1.5.0.8-3

2006-11-28 Thread Bill Allombert
Hello m68k porters, Please mark me (ballombe) as building icedove_1.5.0.8-3 (and other packages you see fit) Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large blue swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble