On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 08:28:50AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > And yet you won't upload the package to non-free, presumably because you
> > think it won't be accepted by the ftp-masters, but you will distribute it
> > from a project box (people.debian.org), which exposes Debian to the same
> > li
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 11:16:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 08:44:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > The problem with miboot is that there are 200 or so m68k instructions
> > > > in the
> > > > boot sector, which have not been changed since over 10 years probab
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 08:44:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > The problem with miboot is that there are 200 or so m68k instructions in
> > > the
> > > boot sector, which have not been changed since over 10 years probably, and
> > > probably nobody at appple even remembers them, and thus we a
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:38:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do we *ship* Penguin? I didn't think that we did?
In contrib.
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem with miboot is that there are 200 or so m68k instructions in the
> boot sector, which have not been changed since over 10 years probably, and
> probably nobody at appple even remembers them, and thus we are not shipping
> miboot even in non-fre
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:38:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is a point that is off-topic for the debian-alpha, debian-amd64, and
> debian-release lists. Stop crossposting this discussion to lists where it
> doesn't belong.
Arg, forgot to uncross post, sorry, will remember next time.
F
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:38:07PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > So why not include aminet, and what ever are the counterparts for atari,
> > > mac, maybe C64, Pet2001, those were nice machines as well, and maybe we
> > > still use something that was first developed on one of those machines.
>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:50:11PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> The main point is, do we ship it as part of the installer stuff, knowing it
> is needed to boot, or even worse in the case of miboot, it needs to be
> built into the images.
This is a point that is off-topic for the debian-alpha, debia
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:17:22PM -0600, Eric Shattow wrote:
> I have used miBoot on a nubus ppc mac (6116cd) and it is not the
> optimal solution. My suggestion as a user is that you forget about
> using miBoot at all, and foster development for a new GPL'ed
> bootloader based on EMILE. Laurent (
On 11/4/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:04:22AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:00:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 1
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:04:22AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:00:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 04,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:08:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> This was resolved, only to hit the next problem with amd64: The amd64
> archive signing key is not trusted by apt. So currently testing amd64
> installs only work from the netinst CD, all the other install methods,
> which use apt auth
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:04:22AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> It is an AmigaOS binary, built from free source with free compilers. So we
> just have to
> include all the free AmigaOS software to be able to ship a precompiled
> amiboot? As I said,
> no problem with me, maybe we include
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:00:03PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Still not in debian/main, so amiboot needs to go to contrib.
> libnix is an AmigaOS library, and is available on aminet, which IIRC predates
> Debian by a couple of years. Do you want to ship all free software on aminet
>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:53:53AM -0700, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:27:52PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrot
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > > Actually, we cou
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:57:12AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Actually, we could simply make an exception for miboot and get it
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Actually, we could simply make an exception for miboot and get it into the
> > > archive, i think it is no worse than other cases (like amibo
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Actually, we could simply make an exception for miboot and get it into the
> > archive, i think it is no worse than other cases (like amiboot, which is
> > linked to parts of amigaos, an
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Actually, we could simply make an exception for miboot and get it into the
> archive, i think it is no worse than other cases (like amiboot, which is
> linked to parts of amigaos, and thus non-free), and we do distribute those (or
> at least used to distribu
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:08:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> installer/doc/devel/release-checklist as we can. At a minimum we need to
> make sure that businesscard, netinst, and full CDs (once we get some)
> work for i386 and powerpc and that the desktop task installs ok and
> works.
Joeyh, i wond
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:08:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> m68k:
>
> I've become aware of another issue, which is that some m68k d-i udebs
> were miscompiled by a broken compiler there and don't work. I understand
> that smarenka has been working on this, but I don't know the currently
> status
An update on the d-i beta status. We're getting really close, AKA most
things seem likely to work now. Ccing some other relevant lists.
debian-boot:
> - Thanks to fjp, base-installer 1.35.4 should get d-i working again with
> secure apt and CDs, but we're currently m
26 matches
Mail list logo
