Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:48:19PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > If no one is interested here, I hope to get time to poke at this some > more. Unfortunately I only have a WarpEngine 4040 which nicely does > the cache flushing for me and so the loader works regardless for me. I'm interested in see

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:20:08PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > The only way I could get usable colours on my Q40 was to > hardcode this into hw/xfree86/drivers/fbdev/fbdev.c. Strangely > there is another fbdev driver in hw/kdrive/fbdev, what is this > good for? Kdrive is a different X server.

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-10 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:37:16PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > It would be certainly good to have the module loader, but for the > average m68k user this is of no benefit and so I think m68k should > default to statically linked Xserver. As the Debian XFree86 package maintainer, and as the ow

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-09 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:48:19PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > It would be certainly good to have the module loader, but for the > > average m68k user this is of no benefit and so I think m68k should > > default to statically linked Xserver. > > Your loosing a lot of configurability without

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-09 Thread Gerhard Täubl
ursday, January 09, 2003 4:48 PM Subject: Re: XFree 4.1 > On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:37:16PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:34:40PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > > > It's only the instruction cache we need to flush. Not the whole c

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-09 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 03:37:16PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:34:40PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > It's only the instruction cache we need to flush. Not the whole cache. > > I notice in asm-m68k/pgalloc.h there's a specific flush_icache() macro > > to do just

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-09 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:34:40PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > It's only the instruction cache we need to flush. Not the whole cache. > I notice in asm-m68k/pgalloc.h there's a specific flush_icache() macro > to do just that. all cacheflush instructions are priviliged. There is a little trick

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-08 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 08:53:21 +0100, Kars de Jong wrote: > On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:45, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:31:45 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:04:35PM +0100, Gerhard Tubl wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > Well I read much stuf

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-08 Thread Kars de Jong
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:45, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:31:45 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:04:35PM +0100, Gerhard Tubl wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Well I read much stuff about xfree and it helps me a lot to get it run, > > > but > > > not

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-08 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:45:55 +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:31:45 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:04:35PM +0100, Gerhard Tubl wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Well I read much stuff about xfree and it helps me a lot to get it run, > > > but

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-08 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:31:45 +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:04:35PM +0100, Gerhard Tubl wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Well I read much stuff about xfree and it helps me a lot to get it run, but > > not really. > > When it starts it works fine (yes I have really installed

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-08 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 09:04:35PM +0100, Gerhard Täubl wrote: > Hi! > > Well I read much stuff about xfree and it helps me a lot to get it run, but > not really. > When it starts it works fine (yes I have really installed KDE2 wow, real > slow, but it works..) > > I also read bout the problems o

Re: XFree 4.1

2003-01-07 Thread Lincoln Rutledge
Gerhard, Have you tried any twiddling with the XF86Config file? There are a couple of things I would try: -Remark out this line: Load"glx" by putting a # as the first character: #Load"glx" Also remark this line: #Videoram4096 Try remarking out this line

XFree 4.1

2003-01-07 Thread Gerhard Täubl
Hi! Well I read much stuff about xfree and it helps me a lot to get it run, but not really. When it starts it works fine (yes I have really installed KDE2 wow, real slow, but it works..) I also read bout the problems on the xfree server 4.0 with the "Caught signal 11. Server aborting" problem. A