On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 7/28/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> >
> > > > But if you find that Linux 2.6 lacks functionality in 2.2 or in
> > > > BSD, please tell us because then (time permitting) we could
> > > >
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:34:31PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 7/28/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know what 2.2 did either. Looking at the 2.6 code tells me that
> > only the valkyrie driver can switch modes, which seems to agree with the
> > FAQ.
>
> I am not tryin
On 7/28/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
>
> > > But if you find that Linux 2.6 lacks functionality in 2.2 or in BSD,
> > > please tell us because then (time permitting) we could feasibly
> > > improve the drivers.
> >
> > well I don't know what
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> > But if you find that Linux 2.6 lacks functionality in 2.2 or in BSD,
> > please tell us because then (time permitting) we could feasibly
> > improve the drivers.
>
> well I don't know what 2.2 did, but on my quadra475/605 (w/CPU replace
> w/FPU). I
On 7/12/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
>
> > 2007/6/5, Brad Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:55:42PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > there is some issue about whatever mode you boot from too,
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> 2007/6/5, Brad Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:55:42PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > there is some issue about whatever mode you boot from too, there is
> > > trouble switching if you change your mind.
> >
> >
2007/6/5, Brad Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:55:42PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 6/4/07, Eugen Paiuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on the other hand, my hand fixed xorg.conf *will* do 800x600 8 bit.
> it may do 640x480 16 bit too with a little more patience, I think.
>
Results of us keyboard repeat :
here all keys do repeat.
tests on quadra 630, kernel 2.6.21-2-mac - from debian mirrors- , xorg-7.1.1,
release etch-m68k.
very likely, availble on every mac who boot that kernel, and do start X.
please,use keypad without numlock enabled, for:
arrow up, down, left
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:07:15PM -0500, Joel Ewy wrote:
> I believe that Potato used xfree and Woody introduced x.org
> (though I could be wrong on this.)
Actually, the switch was much more recent than that. I can't
really help much on the key repeat issue, but I can assure
you that the sarge sy
Hi,
I precise that all test are made with 2.2.25 kernel.
I'll looking for "repeat" and I'll tel you soon what I have here.
regards,
--ee
2007/7/11, Joel Ewy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Eugen,
If I read you right, you are running xorg 7.1.1 under etch-m68k on
several Mac systems. I have installed
Eugen,
If I read you right, you are running xorg 7.1.1 under etch-m68k on
several Mac systems. I have installed Woody and Sarge on Quadra 630,
Quadra 700, and Quadra 840av systems and have noticed that on all of
these systems key repeat does not work in X. It does work in the
console, but in X y
2007/6/2, Brian Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 6/1/07, Eugen Paiuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server configuration file)
> #
>
>
>
> I tested your xorg.conf on etch and is ok. Thank for your work.
>
> Funy, now, even the "standard" xorg.conf , in depth 16 is w
On 6/11/07, Finn Thain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Brad Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> there is some other bottleneck on 630 which causes for instance very
> slow some Xapps which do work such as pdf viewers (looks like ~20% the
> sp
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> > well my priority is with the q630 to have keypad support and xemacs X
> > support first (to support my goal use it as educational development
> > platform, exploiting the uniformity of "debian is debian"). also s
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 6/5/07, Brad Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > four letter acronym you saw is DAFB, which is the name of the
> > particular hardware in the Q650 (among others).
>
> well I wondered if it were a real chip or simply a generic name like
> "Mac".
On 6/5/07, Brad Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:55:42PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
≈≈
> when i tried on mine i did not realize that (appears) the framebuffer
> is named "MAC" (so kernel indicates choices of either that or "Valkyrie"
> which is correct for 630 but no
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:55:42PM -0700, Brian Morris wrote:
> On 6/4/07, Eugen Paiuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on the other hand, my hand fixed xorg.conf *will* do 800x600 8 bit.
> it may do 640x480 16 bit too with a little more patience, I think.
>
> there is some issue about whatever mode y
On 6/4/07, Eugen Paiuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2007/6/2, Brian Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 6/1/07, Eugen Paiuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server configuration file)
> > #
> > # This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool,
2007/6/2, Brian Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 6/1/07, Eugen Paiuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server configuration file)
> #
>
>
>
> I tested your xorg.conf on etch and is ok. Thank for your work.
>
> Funy, now, even the "standard" xorg.conf , in depth 16 is w
On 6/1/07, Eugen Paiuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# xorg.conf (xorg X Window System server configuration file)
#
# This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using
# values from the debconf database.
# Then it was modified by hand merging with ppc
xorg.conf that worked a
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 06:35:14PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Unimplemented, perhaps? log and exp may indeed be unimplemented yet. Time
> > > to fix that ...
> >
> > flogn and fetox are implemented in the 68881 and 68882, but not in the
> > 68040 and 68060. However, on the latter ones they
> > Unimplemented, perhaps? log and exp may indeed be unimplemented yet. Time
> > to fix that ...
>
> flogn and fetox are implemented in the 68881 and 68882, but not in the
> 68040 and 68060. However, on the latter ones they should be emulated by
> the kernel.
In the LC040, it might be a case of b
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:24:03PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Xorg has a bug on processor (>68020) with out native fpu.
> >
> > {You just hit an inplemented fpu instruction (flogn) and (fetox)
>
> Unimplemented, perhaps? log and exp may indeed be unimplemented yet. Time
> to fix that ...
f
> Xorg has a bug on processor (>68020) with out native fpu.
>
> {You just hit an inplemented fpu instruction (flogn) and (fetox)
Unimplemented, perhaps? log and exp may indeed be unimplemented yet. Time
to fix that ...
> Backtrace:
> 0: /usr/bin/X11/X(xf86 SigHandler+0x6e)[0x8007b7de]
> 1:[0xefce
24 matches
Mail list logo
