Marco d'Itri writes:
> On Sep 23, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE
> > > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting
> > > >ICE but poor at spotting wrong code generation which
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:47:08PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 23, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE
> > > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting
> > > >ICE but poo
On Sep 23, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE
> > >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting
> > >ICE but poor at spotting wrong code generation which is an at least as
> > >serious
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:38:30PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> In linux.debian.devel.release Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE
> >instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting
> >ICE b
In linux.debian.devel.release Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, the real problem here is gcc-4.0 especially at -O3. On m68k it ICE
>instead of spewing wrong code like on i386. We are very good at spotting
>ICE but poor at spotting wrong code generation which is an at least as
>serio
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in recent weeks from the global point of view m68k has started to hold
> up the testing migration due to both lacking buildd power and internal
> compiler errors. As of the most recent britney run, the number of
> missing bu
6 matches
Mail list logo
