Kolbjørn Barmen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 02:13:48PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:50:07PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
binutils and gcc patches are at [0]. Let the fun begin. :)
[0] http://people.debian.org/~smarenk
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 02:13:48PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:50:07PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > > binutils and gcc patches are at [0]. Let the fun begin. :)
> > >
> > > [0] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m6
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 02:13:48PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:50:07PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > binutils and gcc patches are at [0]. Let the fun begin. :)
> >
> > [0] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/tls/
>
> Bit of a problem:
>
> Forbidden
>
> You do
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:50:07PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> binutils and gcc patches are at [0]. Let the fun begin. :)
>
> [0] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/tls/
Bit of a problem:
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /~smarenka/m68k/tls/binutils_patch1 on this
serve
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:39:17AM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:25:53PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>
Fixing gcc-4.4 is pretty much mandatory. I've heard there are patches
for TLS making their way into upstream somewhere, sometime
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:25:53PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Fixing gcc-4.4 is pretty much mandatory. I've heard there are patches
for TLS making their way into upstream somewhere, sometime.
FYI, TLS patches are in gcc-trunk (what will become gcc-4.5).
Any chance
Brad Boyer wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:25:53PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
Fixing gcc-4.4 is pretty much mandatory. I've heard there are patches
for TLS making their way into upstream somewhere, sometime.
FYI, TLS patches are in gcc-trunk (what will become gcc-4
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:25:53PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>> Fixing gcc-4.4 is pretty much mandatory. I've heard there are patches
>> for TLS making their way into upstream somewhere, sometime.
>
> FYI, TLS patches are in gcc-trunk (what will become gcc-4.5).
Any chance they are easily back
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:25:53PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> >Fixing gcc-4.4 is pretty much mandatory. I've heard there are patches
> >for TLS making their way into upstream somewhere, sometime.
>
> FYI, TLS patches are in gcc-trunk (what will become gcc-4.5).
That
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
...
Fixing gcc-4.4 is pretty much mandatory. I've heard there are patches
for TLS making their way into upstream somewhere, sometime.
FYI, TLS patches are in gcc-trunk (what will become gcc-4.5).
--
Maxim K.
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-68k-requ.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:10:32AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Turns out libc6 requires libgcc2, which is no longer available (unless
> one installs stable). Since upgrading gcc to a fairly recent version now
> conflicts against libgcc2, too, upgrading would require throwing libc6
> off the sy
11 matches
Mail list logo
