On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:28:38AM -0500, lrutledge wrote:
> As I understand it the problem with writing a floppy driver is that the chip
> was not designed for such things. So Woz did some awful hacks and wierd
> logic
> in MacOS to make it use the chip as a floppy controller. So far no one h
Howdy,
As I understand it the problem with writing a floppy driver is that the chip
was not designed for such things. So Woz did some awful hacks and wierd logic
in MacOS to make it use the chip as a floppy controller. So far no one has
been able to work out the magic.
Apple released the chi
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Ray Knight wrote:
> Sorry I was warning against the use of the -A option for updating as
> linux-2_2 is a branch and you'd end up with the HEAD which is 2.4 and
> obsolete in that repository.
>
> For 2.2 code:
> CVSROOT=:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/linux-mac68k
>
> Ac
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 20:51, Hank wrote:
> >
> >
> >I applied your patch to the 2.2.22 source on sourceforge. We're at 2.2.23
> >on sourceforge now so getting the latest 2.2 source should include your
> >patch to the floppy driver. I was able to get my IIfx to eject, but I seem
> >to recall it
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 12:19, Carsten Neumann wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Ray Knight wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 22:29, Carsten Neumann wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > I applied your patch to the 2.2.22 source on sourceforge. We're at
> > > > 2.2.23 on sou
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Ray Knight wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 22:29, Carsten Neumann wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I applied your patch to the 2.2.22 source on sourceforge. We're at
> > > 2.2.23 on sourceforge now so getting the latest 2.2 source should include
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 22:29, Carsten Neumann wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I applied your patch to the 2.2.22 source on sourceforge. We're at 2.2.23
> > on sourceforge now so getting the latest 2.2 source should include your
> > patch to the floppy driver. I was abl
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I applied your patch to the 2.2.22 source on sourceforge. We're at 2.2.23 on
> sourceforge now so getting the latest 2.2 source should include your patch to
> the floppy driver. I was able to get my IIfx to eject, but I seem to recall
> it failed
I applied your patch to the 2.2.22 source on sourceforge. We're at 2.2.23 on
sourceforge now so getting the latest 2.2 source should include your patch to
the floppy driver. I was able to get my IIfx to eject, but I seem to recall it
failed on my Q950.
Ray
Well, I guess you don't need to make
On 25 Feb 2003, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:36:34AM +0100,
> Carsten Neumann wrote:
> > isn't the hardware very similar to the one
> > in the IIfx?
>
> Yes, it's functionally identical. The chips
> are just at a different address, but that's
> already in the driver.
>
> > On W
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:36:34AM +0100, Carsten Neumann wrote:
> isn't the hardware very similar to the one in the IIfx?
Yes, it's functionally identical. The chips are just at a different
address, but that's already in the driver.
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Hank wrote:
> > I see that floppy suppor
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 04:36:34AM +0100, Carsten Neumann wrote:
> isn't the hardware very similar to the one in the IIfx?
Yes, there is. In fact, if my mind hasn't deserted me, the driver also
recognises those disk drives, and tries to do something useful with
them. I played with it quite some
Hi all,
isn't the hardware very similar to the one in the IIfx?
Greetings,
Carsten
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Hank wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I see that floppy support has been built into the patched 2.2.20 kernel.
> dmesg | grep -i fdhdreturns the following:
> SWIM-IOP: drive 0 is an FDHD (ex
Hi!
I see that floppy support has been built into the patched 2.2.20 kernel.
dmesg | grep -i fdhdreturns the following:
SWIM-IOP: drive 0 is an FDHD (ext, floppy, removable, primary)
I'm not able to find any device for this in the /dev directory. Most likely
because there isn't one.
Is ther
14 matches
Mail list logo
