On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:38:34PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > and another one.
>
> I forwarded this one three days ago. ;-)
Whoops. Missed that one, sorry.
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes",
.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
> UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.3
> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 09:42:31 +0200
> From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
> Cc: Debian Securi
PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403
Cc: Debian Security Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mozilla failure
Could somebody reque mozilla/stable-security on a buildd that
does not run Linux 2.2?
Regards,
Joey
-
Is this for one of kullervo or crest?
- Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian Security Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mozilla failure
Could somebody reque mozilla/st
After a reinstall of woody I can't get Mozilla running again, just like the
last time a long time ago.
Tried starting it with --no-remote like I think I got it working before but no
success. Tried with 8, 16 and 24 bit X sessions (Amiga 4000/040 with CV3D) and
some other options but no r
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:53:14PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mozilla-thunderbird failed with no space left on device and is somehow
> stuck! Could someone
> please requeue it?
wonky! done.
The right list of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life&#x
Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> mozilla-thunderbird failed with no space left on device and is somehow
> stuck! Could someone
> please requeue it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Alexander
Wrong list. CCing.
The official email for buildd problems is @buildd.
Hi,
mozilla-thunderbird failed with no space left on device and is somehow
stuck! Could someone
please requeue it?
Thanks
Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack | : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `&
On 2004-04-19 Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mozilla failed to build three days ago,
[...]
> 1.6-4 built fine on m68k and there was *no* changes of the sourcecode
> from 1.6-4-->1.6-5:
[...]
> Could it be rescheduled, 1.6-5 is the first 1.6 that could go to s
Hello,
mozilla failed to build three days ago,
http://www.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_Failed.html
--
make[5]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/mozilla-1.6/build-tree/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign/mangle'
Fri Apr 16 12:47:04 UTC 2004
Linux2.4_m68k_glibc_PTH_OPT.OBJ/shlibsi
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:13:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Consider the following:
> >
> > A good starting point would be the popularity-contest data. Anything
> > used in the last half year gets build.
> >
> > Every package thats not
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 02:37:21PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> And the next step, is we take advantage of our large network of user
> computers. When the above happens, we copy the completed package to
> the archive ... and end up doing all our packages this way.
>
> OK, well, it's probably not
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:13:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Consider the following:
>
> A good starting point would be the popularity-contest data. Anything
> used in the last half year gets build.
>
> Every package thats not compiled is replaced by a dummy package
> stating why it is
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On 28 Nov 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Even if we did manage to find a good subset of packages which would be
> > > 'useful' for our users, I'm sure there will be questio
On 28 Nov 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Even if we did manage to find a good subset of packages which would be
> > 'useful' for our users, I'm sure there will be questions of disappointed
> > users inquiring why packages foo and bar are not avai
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Op vr 28-11-2003, om 06:40 schreef Scott Holder:
> > Chris Tillman wrote:
> >
> > > Well, it's true we owe our elders respect (as I give a quick glance
> > >
> > >towards my Mac IIci). But, OTOH, I think the current philosophy of
> > >all-or-none may
nterpreted as "all
packages that contain "m68k" or "any" in their "Architecture:" control
field. Indeed, it has happened in the past that a maintainer removed
m68k from his Architecture field because he thought the package was
useless on m68k; in such a case, we
iling Mozilla 1.5 for m68k, was aiming
for Firebird but didn't read the directions ;) . It works just fine,
too, though is basically unuseable. But, it runs and works. It took two
days to compile ;)
It should be fully compilable from source on PPC too, I'd reckon.
Scott Holder
Op ma 21-07-2003, om 23:17 schreef Geert Uytterhoeven:
> On 21 Jul 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Op do 01-01-1970, om 07:59 schreef Chris Tillman:
> > > Well, it's true we owe our elders respect (as I give a quick glance
> > > towards my Mac IIci). But, OTOH, I think the current philosophy of
>
On 21 Jul 2003, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op do 01-01-1970, om 07:59 schreef Chris Tillman:
> > Well, it's true we owe our elders respect (as I give a quick glance
> > towards my Mac IIci). But, OTOH, I think the current philosophy of
> > all-or-none may be a little too inflexible. Especially as m68
Op do 01-01-1970, om 07:59 schreef Chris Tillman:
> Well, it's true we owe our elders respect (as I give a quick glance
> towards my Mac IIci). But, OTOH, I think the current philosophy of
> all-or-none may be a little too inflexible. Especially as m68k users
> get fewer and fewer, and developers a
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:39:42PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > using debian stable for the last year now... and am still stuck with
> > > mozilla 1.0.0 .. are there any other apt-sources that i can add such
> > > that i can update mozilla to 1.4 - or
e you have an X server (but *no* mozilla)
> running, and then run mozilla?
...or simply call it like "mozilla --no-remote".
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
Op vr 18-07-2003, om 12:55 schreef Thomas Sjölin:
> Hi Wouter
>
> > Hm. That's different from the unstable situation.
> >
> > I can think of two possibilities, right now:
> > 1) there's already a mozilla running, but it takes so much time for it
> >
Hi Wouter
>> I will give that a go and see if I get anything.
>>
>> I really don't need to get Mozilla running, a 040 is way to slow
>> anyway...
>
> Sure, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't work :-)
So true and that's the reason why I'm
Hi Wouter
> Hm. That's different from the unstable situation.
>
> I can think of two possibilities, right now:
> 1) there's already a mozilla running, but it takes so much time for it
> to start properly that you're not aware it's there
> 2) the X server doe
Op wo 16-07-2003, om 15:21 schreef Thomas Sjölin:
> Hi Wouter
>
> >> I honestly don't know what happens. I have tried to get some debug info
> >> out but I get nothing that tells me anything. When I try to start Mozilla
> >> the computer works hard for a whi
Op wo 16-07-2003, om 16:39 schreef Thomas Sjölin:
> Hi again Wouter
>
> > That's what happens on unstable as well. Try doing
> >
> > echo $?
> >
> > Right after you tried running mozilla, and _before_ you do anything
> > else. Under normal ci
Hi again Wouter
> That's what happens on unstable as well. Try doing
>
> echo $?
>
> Right after you tried running mozilla, and _before_ you do anything
> else. Under normal circumstances, that should give you '0' (zero) as
> output; if it gives anything else
Hi Wouter
>> I honestly don't know what happens. I have tried to get some debug info
>> out but I get nothing that tells me anything. When I try to start Mozilla
>> the computer works hard for a while then it just stops and goes back to
>> idle, after tha
Op wo 16-07-2003, om 12:19 schreef Thomas Sjölin:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I'm just wondering if anyone have gotten the Mozilla in woody to work. I
> >> can't get it running on my A4k with CV64/3D.
> >
> > You mean even the woody ver
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm just wondering if anyone have gotten the Mozilla in woody to work. I
>> can't get it running on my A4k with CV64/3D.
>
> You mean even the woody version doesn't work?
>
> Last I tried, it didn't run on unstable,
Op di 15-07-2003, om 20:27 schreef Thomas Sjölin:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm just wondering if anyone have gotten the Mozilla in woody to work. I
> can't get it running on my A4k with CV64/3D.
You mean even the woody version doesn't work?
Last I tried, it didn't ru
Hi everyone,
I'm just wondering if anyone have gotten the Mozilla in woody to work. I
can't get it running on my A4k with CV64/3D.
Regards
--
Thomas Sjölin
http://home.infoscandic.se/thomas
What happens to the hole when the cheese is gone?
-- Bertolt Brecht
34 matches
Mail list logo
